From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@kernel.org>
To: Gerd Hoffmann <kraxel@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Anthony Liguori <aliguori@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: make pci bar layout more flexible.
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 12:04:44 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304110444.GB27463@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425466550.8389.10.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:55:50AM +0100, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > > VirtIOPCIProxy subclasses which need additional pci bars, such as
> > > virtio-vga, just need to make sure they register the additinal bars
> > > before initializing virtio-pci, so the superclass can see the registered
> > > bars and shuffle around the virtio bars accordingly.
> >
> > I think I prefer we just DTRT and keep same layouts for everyone by
> > default: isn't there a layout that is good for everybody?
>
> I want bar #2 for the vga framebuffer for virtio-vga. Which conflicts
> with bar #2 being used for the modern bar in todays code.
OK, and IIUC you are saying that using bar #2 for that is a requirement for
vga to work?
> We can move the modern bar to #4 for everybody, then we'll have:
>
> #0 -- legacy i/o
> #1 -- msix
> #2 -- unused (by virtio)
> #3 -- unused (by virtio)
> #4 -- modern mem
> #5 -- modern mem too (because it's 64bit).
>
> That'll leave bars #2 + #3 free, for additional bars (1x 64bit or 2x
> 32bit) such as vga framebuffer if needed.
Yes, that's fine with me.
> > I know this means we'll leave BAR0 unused for modern devices but that
> > does not seem too bad.
>
> Yep, no technical reason against it, although it IMHO looks nicer.
>
> cheers,
> Gerd
If we run into a problem, we'll be able to reshuffle it all easily.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 11:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-03 13:55 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] virtio-pci: make pci bar layout more flexible Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-03 17:42 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04 10:55 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-04 11:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-03-04 11:46 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-03-04 11:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-03-04 12:04 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150304110444.GB27463@redhat.com \
--to=mst@kernel.org \
--cc=aliguori@amazon.com \
--cc=kraxel@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).