From: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
Cc: QEMU Trivial <qemu-trivial@nongnu.org>,
Amit Shah <amit.shah@redhat.com>,
QEMU Developer <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] migration: Fix remaining 32 bit compiler errors
Date: Wed, 4 Mar 2015 13:31:20 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150304133120.GG2530@work-vm> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425146983-16015-4-git-send-email-sw@weilnetz.de>
* Stefan Weil (sw@weilnetz.de) wrote:
> Fix type casts between pointers and 64 bit integers.
> Now 32 bit builds are possible again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>
> ---
> migration/rdma.c | 57 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------
> 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/migration/rdma.c b/migration/rdma.c
> index 1512460..a68f1f1 100644
> --- a/migration/rdma.c
> +++ b/migration/rdma.c
> @@ -493,8 +493,8 @@ static inline uint64_t ram_chunk_index(const uint8_t *start,
> static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_start(const RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block,
> uint64_t i)
> {
> - return (uint8_t *) (((uintptr_t) rdma_ram_block->local_host_addr)
> - + (i << RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT));
> + return (uint8_t *)(uintptr_t)(rdma_ram_block->local_host_addr +
> + (i << RDMA_REG_CHUNK_SHIFT));
> }
>
> static inline uint8_t *ram_chunk_end(const RDMALocalBlock *rdma_ram_block,
> @@ -515,7 +515,7 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr,
> {
This will clash with my 'unbreak dtrace tracing due to double _ in rdma names' that's
going through Stefan's tree.
> RDMALocalBlocks *local = &rdma->local_ram_blocks;
> RDMALocalBlock *block = g_hash_table_lookup(rdma->blockmap,
> - (void *) block_offset);
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)block_offset);
> RDMALocalBlock *old = local->block;
>
> assert(block == NULL);
> @@ -526,9 +526,11 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr,
> int x;
>
> for (x = 0; x < local->nb_blocks; x++) {
> - g_hash_table_remove(rdma->blockmap, (void *)old[x].offset);
> - g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *)old[x].offset,
> - &local->block[x]);
> + g_hash_table_remove(rdma->blockmap,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)old[x].offset);
> + g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)old[x].offset,
> + &local->block[x]);
> }
> memcpy(local->block, old, sizeof(RDMALocalBlock) * local->nb_blocks);
> g_free(old);
> @@ -549,12 +551,12 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_add_block(RDMAContext *rdma, void *host_addr,
>
> block->is_ram_block = local->init ? false : true;
>
> - g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *) block_offset, block);
> + g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *)(uintptr_t)block_offset, block);
>
> trace___qemu_rdma_add_block(local->nb_blocks,
> - (uint64_t) block->local_host_addr, block->offset,
> + (uintptr_t)block->local_host_addr, block->offset,
> block->length,
> - (uint64_t) (block->local_host_addr + block->length),
> + (uintptr_t)(block->local_host_addr + block->length),
> BITS_TO_LONGS(block->nb_chunks) *
> sizeof(unsigned long) * 8,
> block->nb_chunks);
> @@ -595,7 +597,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_init_ram_blocks(RDMAContext *rdma)
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int __qemu_rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, ram_addr_t block_offset)
> +static int __qemu_rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, uintptr_t block_offset)
> {
> RDMALocalBlocks *local = &rdma->local_ram_blocks;
> RDMALocalBlock *block = g_hash_table_lookup(rdma->blockmap,
> @@ -635,7 +637,7 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, ram_addr_t block_offset)
> block->remote_keys = NULL;
>
> for (x = 0; x < local->nb_blocks; x++) {
> - g_hash_table_remove(rdma->blockmap, (void *)old[x].offset);
> + g_hash_table_remove(rdma->blockmap, (void *)(uintptr_t)old[x].offset);
> }
>
> if (local->nb_blocks > 1) {
> @@ -658,9 +660,9 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, ram_addr_t block_offset)
> }
>
> trace___qemu_rdma_delete_block(local->nb_blocks,
> - (uint64_t)block->local_host_addr,
> + (uintptr_t)block->local_host_addr,
> block->offset, block->length,
> - (uint64_t)(block->local_host_addr + block->length),
> + (uintptr_t)(block->local_host_addr + block->length),
> BITS_TO_LONGS(block->nb_chunks) *
> sizeof(unsigned long) * 8, block->nb_chunks);
>
> @@ -670,8 +672,9 @@ static int __qemu_rdma_delete_block(RDMAContext *rdma, ram_addr_t block_offset)
>
> if (local->nb_blocks) {
> for (x = 0; x < local->nb_blocks; x++) {
> - g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap, (void *)local->block[x].offset,
> - &local->block[x]);
> + g_hash_table_insert(rdma->blockmap,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)local->block[x].offset,
> + &local->block[x]);
> }
> }
>
> @@ -1076,7 +1079,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_reg_whole_ram_blocks(RDMAContext *rdma)
> * This search cannot fail or the migration will fail.
> */
> static int qemu_rdma_search_ram_block(RDMAContext *rdma,
> - uint64_t block_offset,
> + uintptr_t block_offset,
> uint64_t offset,
> uint64_t length,
> uint64_t *block_index,
> @@ -1380,8 +1383,8 @@ static uint64_t qemu_rdma_poll(RDMAContext *rdma, uint64_t *wr_id_out,
> RDMALocalBlock *block = &(rdma->local_ram_blocks.block[index]);
>
> trace_qemu_rdma_poll_write(print_wrid(wr_id), wr_id, rdma->nb_sent,
> - index, chunk,
> - block->local_host_addr, (void *)block->remote_host_addr);
> + index, chunk, block->local_host_addr,
> + (void *)(uintptr_t)block->remote_host_addr);
I think that's the wrong fix there; remote_host_addr is actually 64bit because
even if this host is 32bit the other end might be 64bit; I think the right
fix is to change the trace to use a uint64_t for the remote_host_addr.
> clear_bit(chunk, block->transit_bitmap);
>
> @@ -1524,7 +1527,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_post_send_control(RDMAContext *rdma, uint8_t *buf,
> RDMAWorkRequestData *wr = &rdma->wr_data[RDMA_WRID_CONTROL];
> struct ibv_send_wr *bad_wr;
> struct ibv_sge sge = {
> - .addr = (uint64_t)(wr->control),
> + .addr = (uintptr_t)(wr->control),
No, as before, my belief is that the .addr is a uint64_t.
(Although curiously I did a test and found that gcc lets me pass a uint64_t
to a function that has a uintptr_t parameter on a 32bit machine, but I don't
understand why.)
Dave
> .length = head->len + sizeof(RDMAControlHeader),
> .lkey = wr->control_mr->lkey,
> };
> @@ -1578,7 +1581,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_post_recv_control(RDMAContext *rdma, int idx)
> {
> struct ibv_recv_wr *bad_wr;
> struct ibv_sge sge = {
> - .addr = (uint64_t)(rdma->wr_data[idx].control),
> + .addr = (uintptr_t)(rdma->wr_data[idx].control),
> .length = RDMA_CONTROL_MAX_BUFFER,
> .lkey = rdma->wr_data[idx].control_mr->lkey,
> };
> @@ -1825,11 +1828,12 @@ static int qemu_rdma_write_one(QEMUFile *f, RDMAContext *rdma,
> };
>
> retry:
> - sge.addr = (uint64_t)(block->local_host_addr +
> + sge.addr = (uintptr_t)(block->local_host_addr +
> (current_addr - block->offset));
> sge.length = length;
>
> - chunk = ram_chunk_index(block->local_host_addr, (uint8_t *) sge.addr);
> + chunk = ram_chunk_index(block->local_host_addr,
> + (uint8_t *)(uintptr_t)sge.addr);
> chunk_start = ram_chunk_start(block, chunk);
>
> if (block->is_ram_block) {
> @@ -1882,8 +1886,9 @@ retry:
> * memset() + madvise() the entire chunk without RDMA.
> */
>
> - if (can_use_buffer_find_nonzero_offset((void *)sge.addr, length)
> - && buffer_find_nonzero_offset((void *)sge.addr,
> + if (can_use_buffer_find_nonzero_offset((void *)(uintptr_t)sge.addr,
> + length)
> + && buffer_find_nonzero_offset((void *)(uintptr_t)sge.addr,
> length) == length) {
> RDMACompress comp = {
> .offset = current_addr,
> @@ -2978,7 +2983,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_registration_handle(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque,
> */
> for (i = 0; i < local->nb_blocks; i++) {
> rdma->block[i].remote_host_addr =
> - (uint64_t)(local->block[i].local_host_addr);
> + (uintptr_t)(local->block[i].local_host_addr);
>
> if (rdma->pin_all) {
> rdma->block[i].remote_rkey = local->block[i].mr->rkey;
> @@ -3042,7 +3047,7 @@ static int qemu_rdma_registration_handle(QEMUFile *f, void *opaque,
> goto out;
> }
>
> - reg_result->host_addr = (uint64_t) block->local_host_addr;
> + reg_result->host_addr = (uintptr_t)block->local_host_addr;
>
> trace_qemu_rdma_registration_handle_register_rkey(
> reg_result->rkey);
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
>
--
Dr. David Alan Gilbert / dgilbert@redhat.com / Manchester, UK
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-04 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-28 18:09 [Qemu-devel] migration: Fix 32 bit compiler errors Stefan Weil
2015-02-28 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/3] migration: Fix coding style (whitespace issues) Stefan Weil
2015-03-02 12:15 ` Michael Tokarev
2015-03-04 12:20 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-03-17 12:42 ` Juan Quintela
2015-02-28 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/3] migration: Fix some 32 bit compiler errors Stefan Weil
2015-03-04 12:44 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-03-04 21:00 ` Stefan Weil
2015-03-05 10:28 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-03-17 13:10 ` Juan Quintela
2015-02-28 18:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/3] migration: Fix remaining " Stefan Weil
2015-03-04 13:31 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert [this message]
2015-03-04 20:45 ` Stefan Weil
2015-03-05 10:10 ` Dr. David Alan Gilbert
2015-03-17 13:11 ` Juan Quintela
2015-03-02 5:58 ` [Qemu-devel] migration: Fix " Amit Shah
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150304133120.GG2530@work-vm \
--to=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=amit.shah@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-trivial@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
--cc=sw@weilnetz.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).