From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33375) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUJHk-0000va-7F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 13:17:12 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUJHh-0002GZ-1t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 13:17:12 -0500 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YUJHg-0002GR-R5 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 07 Mar 2015 13:17:08 -0500 Date: Sat, 7 Mar 2015 19:17:03 +0100 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150307181703.GB31192@redhat.com> References: <20150304151003.GA3635@redhat.com> <87r3t242x0.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PULL v5] pci, pc, virtio fixes and cleanups List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Markus Armbruster , QEMU Developers On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 11:37:49PM +0900, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 6 March 2015 at 23:27, Markus Armbruster wrote: > > It looks like we now generate a bunch of files that used to be > > git-controlled. The "generate" part is fine. But generating into the > > source tree is asking for trouble. > > > > What happens when I build separate build trees in parallel? > > > > Why is it a good idea to generate into the source tree instead of the > > build tree? > > That sounds like a bug to me... > > -- PMM OK Markus now confirmed this wasn't (necessarily) triggered by these patches. So nothing should block this pull request now? -- MST