From: Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@redhat.com>
To: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, famz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com,
vsementsov@parallels.com, stefanha@redhat.com, mreitz@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/11] iotests: add transactional incremental backup test
Date: Wed, 11 Mar 2015 13:11:38 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150311121138.GA28559@tesla.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1425528911-10300-3-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com>
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 11:15:02PM -0500, John Snow wrote:
> Reviewed-by: Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
> Signed-off-by: John Snow <jsnow@redhat.com>
> ---
> tests/qemu-iotests/124 | 49 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> tests/qemu-iotests/124.out | 4 ++--
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
This tests seems to fail locally:
. . .
+======================================================================
+FAIL: test_incremental_failure (__main__.TestIncrementalBackup)
+Test: Verify backups made after a failure are correct.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+Traceback (most recent call last):
+ File "124", line 331, in test_incremental_failure
+ self.create_incremental()
+ File "124", line 167, in create_incremental
+ return self.wait_incremental(bitmap, validate)
+ File "124", line 179, in wait_incremental
+ self.assert_qmp_absent(event, 'data/error')
+ File "/home/kashyapc/tinker-space/qemu-upstream/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line 282, in assert_qmp_absent
+ self.fail('path "%s" has value "%s"' % (path, str(result)))
+AssertionError: path "data/error" has value "Input/output error"
+
+======================================================================
+FAIL: test_transaction_failure (__main__.TestIncrementalBackup)
+Test: Verify backups made from a transaction that partially fails.
+----------------------------------------------------------------------
+Traceback (most recent call last):
+ File "124", line 448, in test_transaction_failure
+ self.wait_incremental(dr1bm0, 'drive1')
+ File "124", line 179, in wait_incremental
+ self.assert_qmp_absent(event, 'data/error')
+ File "/home/kashyapc/tinker-space/qemu-upstream/tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py", line 282, in assert_qmp_absent
+ self.fail('path "%s" has value "%s"' % (path, str(result)))
+AssertionError: path "data/error" has value "Input/output error"
+
----------------------------------------------------------------------
. . .
Complete stderr of `./check -qcow2` here:
https://kashyapc.fedorapeople.org/virt/qemu-incremental-backup-tests/stderr-qemu-io-tests-qcow2-11MAR2015.txt
And, as per the other two failures of tests 051 and 061 (that you
mentioned on #qemu yesterday), Kevin Wolf on IRC said:
051 was fixed, but the output has changed _again_. That change is from
armbru_'s commit 7ee6c1e18. We need to update the reference output.
As for 061, Max sent a patch, but I think we need to fix qemu rather
than updating the reference output there
Because the error message has become considerably worse
To test, I applied these two series to yesterday's QEMU git master:
[PATCH 00/11] block: incremental backup transactions
[PATCH v2 00/17] block: transactionless incremental backup
So, I'm here (28 commits ahead of commit 3539bbb on master) after
applying the patch series:
$ git describe
v2.2.0-1190-g41b7f5f
I need to try w/ today's git though, yet.
--
/kashyap
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/124 b/tests/qemu-iotests/124
> index 1c07387..da0bf6d 100644
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/124
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/124
> @@ -184,6 +184,55 @@ class TestIncrementalBackup(iotests.QMPTestCase):
> return True
>
>
> + def test_incremental_transaction(self):
> + '''Test: Verify backups made from transactionally created bitmaps.
> +
> + Create a bitmap "before" VM execution begins, then create a second
> + bitmap AFTER writes have already occurred. Use transactions to create
> + a full backup and synchronize both bitmaps to this backup.
> + Create an incremental backup through both bitmaps and verify that
> + both backups match the full backup.
> + '''
> + bitmap0 = self.add_bitmap('bitmap0', 'drive0')
> + self.hmp_io_writes('drive0', (('0xab', 0, 512),
> + ('0xfe', '16M', '256k'),
> + ('0x64', '32736k', '64k')))
> + bitmap1 = self.add_bitmap('bitmap1', 'drive0')
> +
> + result = self.vm.qmp('transaction', actions=[
> + {
> + 'type': 'block-dirty-bitmap-clear',
> + 'data': { 'node': 'drive0',
> + 'name': 'bitmap0' },
> + },
> + {
> + 'type': 'block-dirty-bitmap-clear',
> + 'data': { 'node': 'drive0',
> + 'name': 'bitmap1' },
> + },
> + {
> + 'type': 'drive-backup',
> + 'data': { 'device': 'drive0',
> + 'sync': 'full',
> + 'format': iotests.imgfmt,
> + 'target': self.full_bak },
> + }
> + ])
> + self.assert_qmp(result, 'return', {})
> + self.wait_until_completed()
> + self.files.append(self.full_bak)
> + self.check_full_backup()
> +
> + self.hmp_io_writes('drive0', (('0x9a', 0, 512),
> + ('0x55', '8M', '352k'),
> + ('0x78', '15872k', '1M')))
> + # Both bitmaps should be in sync and create fully valid
> + # incremental backups
> + res1 = self.create_incremental(bitmap0)
> + res2 = self.create_incremental(bitmap1)
> + self.assertTrue(res1 and res2)
> +
> +
> def test_incremental_failure(self):
> '''Test: Verify backups made after a failure are correct.
>
> diff --git a/tests/qemu-iotests/124.out b/tests/qemu-iotests/124.out
> index 89968f3..914e373 100644
> --- a/tests/qemu-iotests/124.out
> +++ b/tests/qemu-iotests/124.out
> @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
> -....
> +.....
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -Ran 4 tests
> +Ran 5 tests
>
> OK
> --
> 1.9.3
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-11 12:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 43+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-05 4:15 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/11] block: incremental backup transactions John Snow
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 01/11] qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations John Snow
2015-03-17 15:14 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 02/11] iotests: add transactional incremental backup test John Snow
2015-03-11 12:11 ` Kashyap Chamarthy [this message]
2015-03-11 14:25 ` John Snow
2015-03-11 16:18 ` Kashyap Chamarthy
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 03/11] block: add transactional callbacks feature John Snow
2015-03-17 17:47 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 18:04 ` John Snow
2015-03-17 18:18 ` Eric Blake
2015-03-17 18:23 ` John Snow
2015-03-17 18:19 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 04/11] block: add refcount to Job object John Snow
2015-03-17 17:54 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 05/11] block: add delayed bitmap successor cleanup John Snow
2015-03-17 18:44 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 19:12 ` John Snow
2015-03-17 22:46 ` John Snow
2015-03-18 13:03 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 06/11] qmp: Add an implementation wrapper for qmp_drive_backup John Snow
2015-03-17 18:51 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 19:16 ` John Snow
2015-03-17 19:33 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 20:15 ` Eric Blake
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 07/11] block: drive_backup transaction callback support John Snow
2015-03-17 19:49 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 23:27 ` John Snow
2015-03-18 13:41 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-18 19:51 ` John Snow
2015-03-18 20:20 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 08/11] iotests: add QMP event waiting queue John Snow
2015-03-17 20:04 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 09/11] iotests: test 124 - drive object refactoring John Snow
2015-03-17 20:44 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 23:40 ` John Snow
2015-03-18 13:44 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 10/11] iotests: 124 - backup_prepare refactoring John Snow
2015-03-17 20:50 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 23:44 ` John Snow
2015-03-05 4:15 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 11/11] iotests: 124 - transactional failure test John Snow
2015-03-17 20:59 ` Max Reitz
2015-03-17 21:04 ` John Snow
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150311121138.GA28559@tesla.redhat.com \
--to=kchamart@redhat.com \
--cc=armbru@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).