From: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: libvir-list@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
donald.d.dugger@intel.com, jun.nakajima@intel.com,
"Paolo Bonzini" <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
"Jiri Denemark" <jdenemar@redhat.com>,
"Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "target-i386: Disable HLE and RTM on Haswell & Broadwell"
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2015 10:18:24 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150316101824.GC10189@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1426273797-11204-2-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com>
On Fri, Mar 13, 2015 at 04:09:56PM -0300, Eduardo Habkost wrote:
> This reverts commit 13704e4c455770d500d6b87b117e32f0d01252c9.
>
> With the Intel microcode update that removed HLE and RTM, there will be
> different kinds of Haswell and Broadwell CPUs out there: some that still
> have the HLE and RTM features, and some that don't have the HLE and RTM
> features. On both cases people may be willing to use the pc-*-2.3
> machine-types.
>
> So instead of making the CPU model results confusing by making it depend
> on the machine-type, keep HLE and RTM on the existing Haswell and
> Broadwell CPU models. The plan is to introduce "Haswell-noTSX" and
> "Broadwell-noTSX" CPU models later, for people who have CPUs that don't
> have TSX feature available.
>
> Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Yep, in this situation we need to support both "models" of CPU, so changing
based on machine type is inappropriate in this scenario.
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Regards,
Daniel
--
|: http://berrange.com -o- http://www.flickr.com/photos/dberrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: http://entangle-photo.org -o- http://live.gnome.org/gtk-vnc :|
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-16 10:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-13 19:09 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] Revert "target-i386: Disable HLE and RTM on Haswell & Broadwell" Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:18 ` Daniel P. Berrange [this message]
2015-03-13 19:09 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-16 10:24 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-19 18:02 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-19 18:14 ` Daniel P. Berrange
2015-03-13 19:25 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] target-i386: Haswell-noTSX and Broadwell-noTSX CPU models Andreas Färber
2015-03-13 19:45 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-03-14 11:42 ` Andreas Färber
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150316101824.GC10189@redhat.com \
--to=berrange@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=donald.d.dugger@intel.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=jdenemar@redhat.com \
--cc=jun.nakajima@intel.com \
--cc=libvir-list@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).