From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com, berto@igalia.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block: Switch to host monotonic clock for IO throttling
Date: Mon, 23 Mar 2015 13:56:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150323135612.GI9268@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1427088255-29885-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1225 bytes --]
On Mon, Mar 23, 2015 at 01:24:15PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> Currently, throttle timers won't make any progress when VCPU is not
> running, which would stall the request queue in utils, qtest, vm
> suspending, and live migration without special handling.
>
> For example in bdrv_drain_all, all requests are resumed immediately
> without taking throttling limit into account. This means whenever it is
> called, IO throttling goes ineffective (examples: system reset,
> migration and many block job operations.).
>
> This might be some loophole that guest could exploit.
>
> If we use the host clock, we can later just trust the nested poll when
> waiting for requests.
>
> Note that for qemu-iotests case 093, which sets up qtest when running
> QEMU, we still use vm clock so the script can control the clock stepping
> in order to be deterministic.
>
> Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
>
> ---
> v2: Don't break qemu-iotests 093.
> ---
> block.c | 9 ++++++++-
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
Should we make an exception for live migration to reduce downtime?
I'm concerned that now vm_stop() can take even longer since we'll wait
for throttling.
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-03-23 13:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-23 5:24 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] block: Switch to host monotonic clock for IO throttling Fam Zheng
2015-03-23 8:10 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-23 8:56 ` Alberto Garcia
2015-03-23 13:56 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
2015-03-23 13:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-23 14:28 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-03-23 14:49 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-23 15:00 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-03-23 15:02 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-03-24 1:17 ` Fam Zheng
2015-03-24 13:29 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150323135612.GI9268@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=berto@igalia.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).