From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46224)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berto@igalia.com>) id 1YfkX0-0006gX-LG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 03:36:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berto@igalia.com>) id 1YfkWw-0000Ww-LE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 03:36:14 -0400
Received: from smtp3.mundo-r.com ([212.51.32.191]:59642 helo=smtp4.mundo-r.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <berto@igalia.com>) id 1YfkWw-0000Wj-EJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 08 Apr 2015 03:36:10 -0400
Date: Wed, 8 Apr 2015 09:35:44 +0200
From: Alberto Garcia <berto@igalia.com>
Message-ID: <20150408073544.GA9047@igalia.com>
References: <1428206887-7921-1-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
	<55228678.1090609@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <55228678.1090609@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/36] drop qapi nested structs
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com

On Mon, Apr 06, 2015 at 07:13:28AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:

> My apologies - I mis-typed Berto's email address, so if you
> reply-to-all, you'll get a bounce message if you don't manually fix
> it.  Is it worth me resending the series with an updated CC list?

For me it's not necessary, but thanks for pointing it out!

Berto