From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: "Andreas Färber" <afaerber@suse.de>
Cc: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Failing iotests in v2.3.0-rc2 / master
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 11:57:35 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150414095735.GC4824@noname.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <552897D1.7020300@suse.de>
Am 11.04.2015 um 05:41 hat Andreas Färber geschrieben:
> Hi,
>
> 001 seems to hang for -qcow (or is not reasonably "quick": >5 min).
>
> 033 is failing for -vhdx.
>
> (Note that `make check-block` only tests -qcow2, so didn't uncover
> either of them.)
>
> Given a failing test, am I seeing correctly that there is no command
> line option to skip this one failing test? -x seems to be for groups only.
>
> Regards,
> Andreas
>
> $ ./check -v -T -qcow -g quick
> [...]
> 001 6s ... [05:12:39]
qcow1 is just really slow. 001 passes for me, after 202 seconds (that's
on my SSD, YMMV).
> $ ./check -v -T -vhdx -g quick
> [...]
> 033 1s ... [04:06:09] [04:06:11] - output mismatch (see 033.out.bad)
This seems to be because blkdebug doesn't implement .bdrv_truncate.
Currently the test case isn't suitable for VHDX, which uses explicit
bdrv_truncate() calls to grow the image file. I'll send a patch for
blkdebug to allow this.
However, it seems that there is another problem which causes assertion
failures when using VHDX over blkdebug. Jeff, does the following fix
make sense to you? (I think it does, but I don't understand yet why the
assertion failure is only triggered with blkdebug - or in other words:
"how could this ever work?")
Kevin
--- a/block/vhdx.c
+++ b/block/vhdx.c
@@ -1285,7 +1285,7 @@ static coroutine_fn int vhdx_co_writev(BlockDriverState *bs, int64_t sector_num,
iov2.iov_base = qemu_blockalign(bs, iov2.iov_len);
memset(iov2.iov_base, 0, iov2.iov_len);
qemu_iovec_concat_iov(&hd_qiov, &iov2, 1, 0,
- sinfo.block_offset);
+ iov2.iov_len);
sectors_to_write += iov2.iov_len >> BDRV_SECTOR_BITS;
}
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-14 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-11 3:41 [Qemu-devel] Failing iotests in v2.3.0-rc2 / master Andreas Färber
2015-04-11 14:33 ` Andreas Färber
2015-04-13 16:42 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-04-13 15:29 ` John Snow
2015-04-13 17:03 ` Andreas Färber
2015-04-14 9:57 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2015-04-15 4:53 ` Jeff Cody
2015-04-15 9:26 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-04-15 9:34 ` Andreas Färber
2015-04-15 9:47 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-04-15 9:54 ` Andreas Färber
2015-04-15 11:27 ` Jeff Cody
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150414095735.GC4824@noname.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).