From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38004) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkXgl-0006hQ-7K for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:54:08 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkXgg-0004Hy-95 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:54:07 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.136]:43790) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YkXgg-0004HW-4k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 21 Apr 2015 08:54:02 -0400 Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2015 14:53:54 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150421125354.GA7727@redhat.com> References: <1429604772-2257-1-git-send-email-ghammer@redhat.com> <20150421120641-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] acpi: add a missing backslash to the \_SB scope. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Gal Hammer , Igor Mammedov , QEMU Developers On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 12:33:36PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 21 April 2015 at 11:09, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 21, 2015 at 11:26:12AM +0300, Gal Hammer wrote: > >> A predefined scope in the ACPI specs is precede with a backslash. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Gal Hammer > > > > s/precede/preceded/ > > > > This is correct, but do we need this in 2.3? > > I'm split on this. Thoughts? > > If yes, commit log needs better explanation on what > > the effect on guests is. > > Unless the effect is absolutely catastrophic you've missed > the boat for 2.3, and should settle for 2.4 + cc:stable. > > thanks > -- PMM I rechecked a bunch of guests and they all seem to behave identically with and without the patch. 2.4 it is. Thanks. -- MST