From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52234)
by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from
) id 1YmMQp-0006is-MZ
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 09:17:12 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
(envelope-from ) id 1YmMQm-0001yq-GO
for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 26 Apr 2015 09:17:11 -0400
Date: Sun, 26 Apr 2015 15:17:03 +0200
From: Thomas Huth
Message-ID: <20150426151703.161075bb@tpl530>
In-Reply-To: <20150318122235.7eb71f08@oc7435384737.ibm.com>
References: <20150318122235.7eb71f08@oc7435384737.ibm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 0/7] Remove more unused functions
List-Id:
List-Unsubscribe: ,
List-Archive:
List-Post:
List-Help:
List-Subscribe: ,
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-trivial@nongnu.org
Cc: Thomas Huth
Am Wed, 18 Mar 2015 12:22:35 +0100
schrieb Thomas Huth :
>
> Here are some more patches to remove completely unused functions
> from QEMU. Please review carefully, some of the functions might
> still get usefull in the future again, so if you discover one,
> please let me know, then I'll remove it from the patch series
> again.
>
> v2: Changed series according to review comment from v1:
> - Dropped the patch to remove portio_list_destroy() and
> portio_list_del()
> - Keep the ARI functions in the pci patch since they might get useful
> again
>
> Thomas Huth (7):
> migration: Remove unused functions
> vmxnet: Remove unused function vmxnet_rx_pkt_get_num_frags()
> pci: Remove unused function ich9_d2pbr_init()
> monitor: Remove unused functions
> usb: Remove unused functions
> util: Remove unused functions
> Remove various unused functions
Ping! Now that 2.3.0 (congrats!) has been tagged, could somebody
(Michael via qemu-trivial tree?) please pick up patches 2 to 7? As far
as I know, there haven't been any complaints about them anymore, so I
think it should be ok to include them.
(patch 1 has already been included via the migration tree, so that's
already fine)
Cheers,
Thomas