From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47307) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRFk-0000Ao-L0 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:38:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRFh-0006Pc-FD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:38:12 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:56311) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YnRFh-0006N2-8J for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:38:09 -0400 Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2015 08:38:02 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20150429083802.06f102ea@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150427172320.GC25766@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> References: <1429975686-19494-1-git-send-email-ehabkost@redhat.com> <553BC973.2030506@suse.de> <20150427172320.GC25766@thinpad.lan.raisama.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] QJSON: Use OBJECT_CHECK List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Eduardo Habkost Cc: Michael Roth , agraf@suse.de, Juan Quintela , Andreas =?UTF-8?B?RsOkcmJlcg==?= , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, 27 Apr 2015 14:23:20 -0300 Eduardo Habkost wrote: > On Sat, Apr 25, 2015 at 07:05:55PM +0200, Andreas F=C3=A4rber wrote: > > Am 25.04.2015 um 17:28 schrieb Eduardo Habkost: > > > The QJSON code used casts to (QJSON*) directly, instead of OBJECT_CHE= CK. > > > There were even some functions using object_dynamic_cast() calls > > > followed by assert(), which is exactly what OBJECT_CHECK does (by > > > calling object_dynamic_cast_assert()). > >=20 > > Suggest s/OBJECT_CHECK/OBJECT_CHECK()/g everywhere for clarity. Everywhere? You mean, in other places? In this case someone has to post a different patch. > I assume it can be fixed during commit by whoever is going to queue it. >=20 > >=20 > > >=20 > > > Signed-off-by: Eduardo Habkost > > > --- > > > qjson.c | 10 +++++----- > > > 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) > >=20 > > Reviewed-by: Andreas F=C3=A4rber > >=20 > > Wasn't aware QJSON is using QOM - assuming this will go through some > > QAPI/QMP tree. >=20 > The only user of qjson.c right now is migration code. Should it go through > the migration tree? It could be, but I can take it if nobody does. > Also, why do we have two JSON writers in QEMU? And why do they have > exactly the same name? Not sure I got it, which writers?