From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39781) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpXXS-0001dt-Ii for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 03:45:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YpXXQ-000330-BF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 05 May 2015 03:45:10 -0400 Date: Tue, 5 May 2015 17:40:32 +1000 From: David Gibson Message-ID: <20150505074031.GT14090@voom.redhat.com> References: <1429858066-12088-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1429858066-12088-24-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="rBVNTu5JXDAWzN2S" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1429858066-12088-24-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 23/24] spapr: Support ibm, dynamic-reconfiguration-memory List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Bharata B Rao Cc: mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, imammedo@redhat.com, afaerber@suse.de --rBVNTu5JXDAWzN2S Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 12:17:45PM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote: > Parse ibm,architecture.vec table obtained from the guest and enable > memory node configuration via ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory if guest > supports it. This is in preparation to support memory hotplug for > sPAPR guests. >=20 > This changes the way memory node configuration is done. Currently all > memory nodes are built upfront. But after this patch, only memory@0 node > for RMA is built upfront. Guest kernel boots with just that and rest of > the memory nodes (via memory@XXX or ibm,dynamic-reconfiguration-memory) > are built when guest does ibm,client-architecture-support call. >=20 > Note: This patch needs a SLOF enhancement which is already part of > upstream SLOF. Is it in the SLOF included in the qemu submodule though? If not you should have a patch to update the submodule first. > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao Apart from that, Reviewed-by: David Gibson --=20 David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_ | _way_ _around_! http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson --rBVNTu5JXDAWzN2S Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJVSHPvAAoJEGw4ysog2bOSc4YQAIx6MQ5H2RNLKw5bxIPksCaQ /jKOgRrX0ceDWUy1jOWpJBWyqg3cRKyVGd4NtdvIpLhSEW7DsqpUTDjTnrEJZiOz 3LexSn42QNsPf6x/HEffiDxbh+ObVCxX+nZ2xaLAmuZ1cVLTpjNN068MYGNygToE 5yOZ+tn+STBx+3RL3COecng+kmcs8Ya+sSVQNOaRfYVLP+fzxwu/BwiR5LdR0SJB 50ag1lXp5RBz3i6HgjPKNdizyllrit7H4Aqg04iQ7mR8LEPR9KbxVpzUwjG57q83 f7OGmGSi5heDe5HZBPPEV5HpMMGXxeI1W0O129tPTzszJWsPTykZk20OBmgtWBQf bF97FiKpLtRbx/DQSXGr9Wti3xKUUy46FlIEIfh05z3h792OBm4wWXNpXTWmo4DF yeL+C+sHymacyogVoroBi9PNnofUqd1z4eZrzLamBG2l5qjfLjCYpDJ+eY0Mpih0 t7k1N1ZZpLuEOzzxCQI235Q4ZCQrBmG2hxsVPAaXtNztGzR7n3MtnbwXcI8dCrDW JXqa3xnGbLM9NKghtkWpI3BgmUSVYKgtgK9NAlYs1nGLA/GLlJ63HbeSvFnDXZPT LaCRm3ZDMXS6vkIAH7djfeYhiOoqYS0GUtDQ59VQ6bDd1HFv6izbVJ9Rv5+h3zI8 4gKKKDuEMEeNovnt5mll =/i4g -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --rBVNTu5JXDAWzN2S--