From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43942) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypr8I-0005bw-6k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 00:40:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypr8D-0007nf-2n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 00:40:30 -0400 Received: from e28smtp08.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.8]:53095) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Ypr8C-0007mq-6F for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 06 May 2015 00:40:24 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp08.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 6 May 2015 10:10:21 +0530 Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:10:15 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Message-ID: <20150506044015.GK18380@in.ibm.com> References: <1429858066-12088-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1429858066-12088-9-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150504171504.4a80ff0a@thh440s> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20150504171504.4a80ff0a@thh440s> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v3 08/24] ppc: Prepare CPU socket/core abstraction Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Thomas Huth Cc: mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, aik@ozlabs.ru, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com, imammedo@redhat.com, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, afaerber@suse.de, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On Mon, May 04, 2015 at 05:15:04PM +0200, Thomas Huth wrote: > On Fri, 24 Apr 2015 12:17:30 +0530 > Bharata B Rao wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao > > Signed-off-by: Andreas Färber > > Not sure if QEMU is fully following the kernel Sob-process, but if > that's the case, I think your Sob should be below the one of Andreas in > case you're the last person who touched the patch (and I think that's > the case here since you've sent it out)? The patch is from me, but I included Andreas' sob and copyrights since the code was derived from his equivalent x86 implementation. > > Also a short patch description would be really nice. Guess I will get rid of this whole socket abstraction for now as noted in an earlier thread. Regards, Bharata. Guess I will get rid of this whole socket abstraction for now as noted in an earlier thread. Regards, Bharata.