From: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>
Cc: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>,
Gleb Natapov <gleb@kernel.org>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Daniel Hansel <daniel.hansel@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Andreas Faerber <afaerber@suse.de>,
Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 12/17] target-s390x: Add S390 CPU class initialization routines
Date: Wed, 6 May 2015 10:02:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150506100222.5f443ca3@bee> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150505143406.GT17796@thinpad.lan.raisama.net>
On Tue, 5 May 2015 11:34:06 -0300
Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 04:53:26PM +0200, Michael Mueller wrote:
> > This patch provides routines to dynamically update the previously defined
> > S390 CPU classes in the current host context. The main function performing
> > this process is s390_setup_cpu_classes(). It takes the current host context
> > and a facility list mask as parameter to setup the classes accordingly. It
> > basically performs the following sub-tasks:
> >
> > - Update of CPU classes with accelerator specific host and QEMU properties
> > - Mark adequate CPU class as default CPU class to be used for CPU model 'host'
> > - Invalidate CPU classes not supported by this hosting machine
> > - Define machine type aliases to latest GA number of a processor model
> > - Define aliases for common CPU model names
> > - Set CPU model alias 'host' to default CPU class
> >
> > Forthermore the patch provides the following routines:
> >
> > - cpu_desc_avail(), s390 specific stub indicating that list_cpus() can run
> > - s390_setup_cpu_aliases(), adds cu model aliases
> > - s390_cpu_classes_initialized(), test if CPU classes have been initialized
> > - s390_fac_list_mask_by_machine(), returns facility list mask by machine
> > - s390_current_fac_list_mask(), returns facility list mask of current machine
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Michael Mueller <mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> > ---
> [...]
> > +/**
> > + * s390_setup_cpu_classes:
> > + * @mode: the accelerator mode
> > + * @prop: the machine property structure's address
> > + *
> > + * This function validates the defined cpu classes against the given
> > + * machine properties @prop. Only cpu classes that are runnable on the
> > + * current host will be set active. In addition the corresponding
> > + * cpuid, ibc value and the active set of facilities will be
> > + * initialized. Depending on @mode, the function porforms operations
> > + * on the current or the temporary accelerator properies.
> > + *
> > + * Since: 2.4
> > + */
> > +void s390_setup_cpu_classes(S390AccelMode mode, S390MachineProps *prop,
> > + uint64_t *fac_list_mask)
> > +{
>
> Can't you replace the S390AccelMode arguments everywhere with simply an
> AccelState pointer? That's the kind of thing that should have been
> easier to implement using the accel QOM stuff.
Would just make sense in conjunction with an AccelId indexed array
in the CPU class but see my concerns below.
>
> If you still need to save accel-specific data somewhere (like the
> is_active, is_host and fac_list arrays), maybe it can be indexed using
> the AccelId enum you have introduced, instead of S390AccelMode?
I had an AccelId indexed array in a previous version of the patch but
dismissed it in favor to this AccelMode index approach for the following
reasons:
a) There is just one accelerator active and and a second set of values is
used for the query-cpu-definitions case. Using the AcceldId index would
instantly double the required memory being used for no reason. The size
of the second dimension in uint64_t fac_list[ACCEL_MODE_MAX][FAC_LIST_CPU_S390_SIZE_UINT64];
is architecturally allowed to grow up to 2KB.
b) The information stored has more dimensions than just the accelerator,
it also contains the selected machine (s390-virtio) which is represented
by means of qemu_s390_fac_list_mask[] which currently is identical for
all machines but that will change as the implementation progresses.
So AccelMode (current, tmp) might also not fully express the semantics.
Michael
>
> > + GSList *list;
> > + ParmAddrAddrModeMask parm = {
> > + .mode = mode,
> > + .prop = prop,
> > + .mask = fac_list_mask,
> > + .host_cc = NULL,
> > + };
> > +
> > + list = object_class_get_list(TYPE_S390_CPU, false);
> > + list = g_slist_sort(list, s390_cpu_class_asc_order_compare);
> > +
> > + g_slist_foreach(list, (GFunc) s390_update_cpu_class, (gpointer) &parm);
> > + g_slist_foreach(list, (GFunc) s390_mark_host_cpu_class, (gpointer) &parm);
> > + g_slist_foreach(list, (GFunc) s390_disable_not_supported_cpu_class, &parm);
> > +
> > + g_slist_free(list);
> > +}
> > +
> [...]
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-06 8:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 55+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-27 14:53 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 00/17] s390 cpu model implementation Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 01/17] Introduce stub routine cpu_desc_avail Michael Mueller
2015-05-05 13:55 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-05 16:12 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-05 17:41 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 9:17 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 11:23 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 16:23 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 17:06 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-07 7:35 ` Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 02/17] Add accelerator id and model name to CPUState Michael Mueller
2015-05-05 13:26 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-05 14:36 ` Eric Blake
2015-05-05 14:46 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 9:28 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 9:59 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 11:41 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-07 7:55 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-07 15:04 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 03/17] Extend QMP command query-cpus to return accelerator id and model name Michael Mueller
2015-05-05 13:11 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 9:49 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 11:33 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 04/17] Extend HMP command info cpus to display " Michael Mueller
2015-05-05 13:14 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 7:32 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 10:38 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 12:59 ` Luiz Capitulino
2015-05-06 13:33 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 13:44 ` Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 05/17] Add optional parameters to QMP command query-cpu-definitions Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 12:42 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-07 7:37 ` Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 06/17] target-s390x: Introduce S390 CPU facilities Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 07/17] target-s390x: Generate facility defines per S390 CPU model Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 08/17] target-s390x: Introduce S390 CPU models Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 09/17] target-s390x: Define S390 CPU model specific facility lists Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 10/17] target-s390x: Add S390 CPU model alias definition routines Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 11/17] target-s390x: Add KVM VM attribute interface for S390 CPU models Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 12/17] target-s390x: Add S390 CPU class initialization routines Michael Mueller
2015-05-05 14:34 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 8:02 ` Michael Mueller [this message]
2015-05-06 12:20 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 13/17] target-s390x: Prepare accelerator during S390 CPU object realization Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 14/17] target-s390x: Initialize S390 CPU model name in CPUState Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 15/17] target-s390x: Extend arch specific QMP command query-cpu-definitions Michael Mueller
2015-05-05 18:40 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 15:31 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 16:00 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 16:27 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-06 12:37 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-05-06 14:48 ` Michael Mueller
2015-05-11 16:59 ` Eduardo Habkost
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 16/17] target-s390x: Introduce S390 CPU facility test routine Michael Mueller
2015-04-27 14:53 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v6 17/17] target-s390x: Enable S390 CPU model usage Michael Mueller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150506100222.5f443ca3@bee \
--to=mimu@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=daniel.hansel@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=ehabkost@redhat.com \
--cc=gleb@kernel.org \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rth@twiddle.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).