From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54826) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yqft3-0005gj-Ie for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 06:52:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Yqft2-00030h-Rq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 08 May 2015 06:52:09 -0400 Date: Fri, 8 May 2015 12:52:00 +0200 From: Kevin Wolf Message-ID: <20150508105200.GG4318@noname.redhat.com> References: <1430818093-10346-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com> <554A5462.7010103@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <554A5462.7010103@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH] vmdk: Fix overflow if l1_size is 0x20000000 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Max Reitz Cc: qemu-stable@nongnu.org, Fam Zheng , qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org, rjones@redhat.com Am 06.05.2015 um 19:50 hat Max Reitz geschrieben: > On 05.05.2015 11:28, Fam Zheng wrote: > >Richard Jones caught this bug with afl fuzzer. > > > >In fact, that's the only possible value to overflow (extent->l1_size = > >0x20000000) l1_size: > > > >l1_size = extent->l1_size * sizeof(long) => 0x80000000; > > > >g_try_malloc returns NULL because l1_size is interpreted as negative > >during type casting from 'int' to 'gsize', which yields a enormous > >value. Hence, by coincidence, we get a "not too bad" behavior: > > > >qemu-img: Could not open '/tmp/afl6.img': Could not open > >'/tmp/afl6.img': Cannot allocate memory > > > >Values larger than 0x20000000 will be refused by the validation in > >vmdk_add_extent. > > > >Values smaller than 0x20000000 will not overflow l1_size. > > > >Reported-by: Richard W.M. Jones > >Signed-off-by: Fam Zheng > >--- > > block/vmdk.c | 3 ++- > > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) > > Okay, so because size_t is unsigned, this will not overflow on > systems with sizeof(size_t) == 4 either. > > Reviewed-by: Max Reitz Thanks, applied to the block branch. I think this one is for stable, too. Kevin