From: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
To: "Denis V. Lunev" <den@openvz.org>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-block@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v8 0/2] block: enforce minimal 4096 alignment in qemu_blockalign
Date: Wed, 13 May 2015 16:32:23 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150513153223.GA24352@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1431441056-26198-1-git-send-email-den@openvz.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4800 bytes --]
On Tue, May 12, 2015 at 05:30:54PM +0300, Denis V. Lunev wrote:
> I have used the following program to test
> #define _GNU_SOURCE
>
> #include <stdio.h>
> #include <unistd.h>
> #include <fcntl.h>
> #include <sys/types.h>
> #include <malloc.h>
> #include <string.h>
>
> int main(int argc, char *argv[])
> {
> int fd = open(argv[1], O_RDWR | O_CREAT | O_DIRECT, 0644);
> void *buf;
> int i = 0, align = atoi(argv[2]);
>
> do {
> buf = memalign(align, 4096);
> if (align >= 4096)
> break;
> if ((unsigned long)buf & 4095)
> break;
> i++;
> } while (1);
> printf("%d %p\n", i, buf);
>
> memset(buf, 0x11, 4096);
>
> for (i = 0; i < 100000; i++) {
> lseek(fd, SEEK_CUR, 4096);
> write(fd, buf, 4096);
> }
>
> close(fd);
> return 0;
> }
> for in in `seq 1 30` ; do a.out aa ; done
>
> The file was placed into 8 GB partition on HDD below to avoid speed
> change due to different offset on disk. Results are reliable:
> - 189 vs 180 seconds on Linux 3.16
>
> The following setups have been tested:
> 1) ext4 with block size equals to 1024 over 512/512 physical/logical
> sector size SSD disk
> 2) ext4 with block size equals to 4096 over 512/512 physical/logical
> sector size SSD disk
> 3) ext4 with block size equals to 4096 over 512/4096 physical/logical
> sector size rotational disk (WDC WD20EZRX)
> 4) xfs with block size equals to 4096 over 512/512 physical/logical
> sector size SSD disk
>
> The difference is quite reliable and the same 5%.
> qemu-io -n -c 'write -P 0xaa 0 1G' 1.img
> for image in qcow2 format is 1% faster.
>
> qemu-img is also affected. The difference in between
> qemu-img create -f qcow2 1.img 64G
> qemu-io -n -c 'write -P 0xaa 0 1G' 1.img
> time for i in `seq 1 30` ; do qemu-img convert 1.img -t none -O raw 2.img ; rm -rf 2.img ; done
> is around 126 vs 119 seconds.
>
> The justification of the performance improve is quite interesting.
> From the kernel point of view each request to the disk was split
> by two. This could be seen by blktrace like this:
> 9,0 11 1 0.000000000 11151 Q WS 312737792 + 1023 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 11 2 0.000007938 11151 Q WS 312738815 + 8 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 11 3 0.000030735 11151 Q WS 312738823 + 1016 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 11 4 0.000032482 11151 Q WS 312739839 + 8 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 11 5 0.000041379 11151 Q WS 312739847 + 1016 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 11 6 0.000042818 11151 Q WS 312740863 + 8 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 11 7 0.000051236 11151 Q WS 312740871 + 1017 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 5 1 0.169071519 11151 Q WS 312741888 + 1023 [qemu-img]
> After the patch the pattern becomes normal:
> 9,0 6 1 0.000000000 12422 Q WS 314834944 + 1024 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 6 2 0.000038527 12422 Q WS 314835968 + 1024 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 6 3 0.000072849 12422 Q WS 314836992 + 1024 [qemu-img]
> 9,0 6 4 0.000106276 12422 Q WS 314838016 + 1024 [qemu-img]
> and the amount of requests sent to disk (could be calculated counting
> number of lines in the output of blktrace) is reduced about 2 times.
>
> Both qemu-img and qemu-io are affected while qemu-kvm is not. The guest
> does his job well and real requests comes properly aligned (to page).
>
> Changes from v7:
> - make assignment from v6 unconditional (Kevin)
>
> Changes from v6:
> - explicitely assign opt_mem_alignemnt in raw-posix.c with
> MAX(s->buf_align, getpagesize()) (Kevin)
>
> Changes from v5:
> - found justification from kernel point of view
> - fixed checkpatch warnings in the patch 2
>
> Changes from v4:
> - patches reordered
> - dropped conversion from 512 to BDRV_SECTOR_SIZE
> - getpagesize() is replaced with MAX(4096, getpagesize()) as suggested by
> Kevin
>
> Changes from v3:
> - portable way to calculate system page size used
> - 512/4096 values are replaced with proper macros/values
>
> Changes from v2:
> - opt_mem_alignment is split to opt_mem_alignment for bounce buffering
> and min_mem_alignment to check buffers coming from guest.
>
> Changes from v1:
> - enforces 4096 alignment in qemu_(try_)blockalign, avoid touching of
> bdrv_qiov_is_aligned path not to enforce additional bounce buffering
> as suggested by Paolo
> - reduces 10% to 5% in patch description to better fit 180 vs 189
> difference
>
> Signed-off-by: Denis V. Lunev <den@openvz.org>
> CC: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> CC: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
> CC: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
>
>
Thanks, applied to my block tree:
https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block
Stefan
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 473 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-13 15:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 14:30 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 0/2] block: enforce minimal 4096 alignment in qemu_blockalign Denis V. Lunev
2015-05-12 14:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] block: minimal bounce buffer alignment Denis V. Lunev
2015-05-12 14:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/2] block: align bounce buffers to page Denis V. Lunev
2015-05-13 12:58 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v8 0/2] block: enforce minimal 4096 alignment in qemu_blockalign Kevin Wolf
2015-05-13 15:32 ` Stefan Hajnoczi [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150513153223.GA24352@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com \
--to=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).