From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36904)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1YsiLR-0004cW-1I
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 21:53:53 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <famz@redhat.com>) id 1YsiLQ-0003TY-9l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 13 May 2015 21:53:52 -0400
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 09:53:42 +0800
From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150514015342.GA862@ad.nay.redhat.com>
References: <1431538099-3286-1-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
	<1431538099-3286-11-git-send-email-famz@redhat.com>
	<555333F9.5010307@cn.fujitsu.com>
	<20150513125506.GD30644@ad.nay.redhat.com>
	<5553F687.3040605@cn.fujitsu.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <5553F687.3040605@cn.fujitsu.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2 10/11] blockdev: Block device IO during
 blockdev-backup transaction
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Wen Congyang <wency@cn.fujitsu.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, qemu-block@nongnu.org, armbru@redhat.com, jcody@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, mreitz@redhat.com, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, pbonzini@redhat.com

On Thu, 05/14 09:12, Wen Congyang wrote:
> We will use bdrv_op_block_all() in the job, and don't unblock BLOCK_OP_TYPE_DEVICE_IO.
> Is it OK?

Good question and you're right, it's broken in this series. I will fix it.

Fam