From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
wangxiaolong@ucloud.cn
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] mirror: Do zero write on target if sectors not allocated
Date: Thu, 14 May 2015 21:52:08 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150514135208.GC22867@ad.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <55547956.1050701@redhat.com>
On Thu, 05/14 12:30, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
>
> On 12/05/2015 13:48, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > + if (!bdrv_is_allocated_above(source, NULL, sector_num,
> > + nb_sectors, &pnum)) {
> > + op->nb_sectors = pnum;
> > + if (s->source_may_unmap) {
>
> Can you avoid this check by introducing bdrv_get_block_status_above? Then:
>
> - if BDRV_ZERO, you use bdrv_aio_write_zeroes
>
> - if BDRV_ALLOCATED, you use bdrv_aio_readv
>
> - else you use bdrv_aio_discard
OK, that's better.
>
> > + /*
> > + * Source unallocated sectors have zero data. We can't discard
> > + * target even if s->target_may_unmap, because the discard
> > + * granularity may be different.
> > + */
> > + bdrv_aio_write_zeroes(s->target, sector_num, op->nb_sectors,
> > + s->target_may_unmap ? BDRV_REQ_MAY_UNMAP : 0,
>
> You can set the flag unconditionally. But it's probably better to make
> this a drive-mirror argument instead of checking the target's
> BlockDriverInfo.
OK, I'll add a flag.
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-14 13:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-12 11:48 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] block: Mirror discarded sectors Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 1/6] mirror: Do zero write on target if sectors not allocated Fam Zheng
2015-05-14 10:30 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-14 13:52 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-05-12 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/6] block: Fix dirty bitmap in bdrv_co_discard Fam Zheng
2015-05-14 10:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-12 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 3/6] block: Remove bdrv_reset_dirty Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 4/6] qemu-iotests: Make block job methods common Fam Zheng
2015-05-14 10:31 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-12 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 5/6] qemu-iotests: Add test case for mirror with unmap Fam Zheng
2015-05-14 10:37 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-05-14 13:50 ` Fam Zheng
2015-05-12 11:48 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 6/6] iotests: Use event_wait in wait_ready Fam Zheng
2015-05-14 6:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/6] block: Mirror discarded sectors Fam Zheng
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150514135208.GC22867@ad.nay.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=wangxiaolong@ucloud.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).