From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: famz@redhat.com, qemu-block@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
mreitz@redhat.com, vsementsov@parallels.com, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v3 01/10] qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations
Date: Mon, 18 May 2015 17:03:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150518150305.GI5999@noname.str.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150511131032.GD16270@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1909 bytes --]
Am 11.05.2015 um 15:10 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 08:29:09AM -0600, Eric Blake wrote:
> > On 05/08/2015 07:14 AM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> >
> > > No it doesn't. Actions have to appear atomic to the qmp_transaction
> > > caller. Both approaches achieve that so they are both correct in
> > > isolation.
> > >
> > > The ambiguity is whether "commit the changes" for .commit() means
> > > "changes take effect" or "discard stashed state, making undo
> > > impossible".
> > >
> > > I think the "discard stashed state, making undo impossible"
> > > interpretation is good because .commit() is not allowed to fail. That
> > > function should only do things that never fail.
> > >
> > >> That's going to get hard to maintain as we add more transactions.
> > >
> > > Yes, we need to be consistent and stick to one of the interpretations in
> > > order to guarantee ordering.
> > >
> > > Unfortunately, there is already an inconsistency:
> > >
> > > 1. internal_snapshot - snapshot taken in .prepare()
> > > 2. external_snapshot - BDS node appended in .commit()
> > > 3. drive_backup - block job started in .prepare()
> > > 4. blockdev_backup - block job started in .prepare()
> > >
> > > external_snapshot followed by internal_snapshot acts like the reverse
> > > ordering!
> >
> > Is that fatal, though?
>
> Yes, ordering is critical when add-bitmap or clear-bitmap are combined
> with drive-backup. Typically the drive-backup must happen after
> add-bitmap or clear-bitmap.
Is there a reason to include add-bitmap/clear-bitmap in the transaction
rather than preparing everything before the transaction and then only
starting the backup (possibly of multiple disks) in a transaction?
The original assumption was that there are no interdependencies between
different transaction commands and the order is undefined.
Kevin
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 836 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-18 15:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-04-23 0:04 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 00/10] block: incremental backup transactions John Snow
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 01/10] qapi: Add transaction support to block-dirty-bitmap operations John Snow
2015-04-23 2:22 ` Eric Blake
2015-05-07 14:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-07 17:22 ` John Snow
2015-05-08 13:14 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-08 13:17 ` Max Reitz
2015-05-08 16:19 ` John Snow
2015-05-08 14:29 ` Eric Blake
2015-05-11 13:10 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-05-18 15:03 ` Kevin Wolf [this message]
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 02/10] iotests: add transactional incremental backup test John Snow
2015-04-23 15:30 ` Max Reitz
2015-05-11 13:54 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 03/10] block: rename BlkTransactionState and BdrvActionOps John Snow
2015-05-18 12:23 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] " Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 04/10] block: re-add BlkTransactionState John Snow
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 05/10] block: add transactional callbacks feature John Snow
2015-04-23 15:32 ` Max Reitz
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 06/10] block: add refcount to Job object John Snow
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 07/10] block: add delayed bitmap successor cleanup John Snow
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 08/10] qmp: Add an implementation wrapper for qmp_drive_backup John Snow
2015-04-23 15:38 ` Max Reitz
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 09/10] block: drive_backup transaction callback support John Snow
2015-04-23 15:46 ` Max Reitz
2015-04-23 0:04 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 10/10] iotests: 124 - transactional failure test John Snow
2015-04-23 16:06 ` Max Reitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150518150305.GI5999@noname.str.redhat.com \
--to=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@gmail.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@parallels.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).