From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35776) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YupDH-0004hr-2h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:38:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YupDC-0006ER-19 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:38:11 -0400 Received: from mail.linuxfoundation.org ([140.211.169.12]:51998) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YupDB-0006E5-SD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 19 May 2015 17:38:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 19 May 2015 14:38:01 -0700 From: Andrew Morton Message-Id: <20150519143801.8ba477c3813e93a2637c19cf@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: <1431624680-20153-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> References: <1431624680-20153-1-git-send-email-aarcange@redhat.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 00/23] userfaultfd v4 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Andrea Arcangeli Cc: Hugh Dickins , zhang.zhanghailiang@huawei.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, Pavel Emelyanov , linux-api@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Weiner , Dave Hansen , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, Andres Lagar-Cavilla , Mel Gorman , Paolo Bonzini , "Kirill A. Shutemov" , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , Sanidhya Kashyap , Linus Torvalds , Andy Lutomirski , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" , Peter Feiner On Thu, 14 May 2015 19:30:57 +0200 Andrea Arcangeli wrote: > This is the latest userfaultfd patchset against mm-v4.1-rc3 > 2015-05-14-10:04. It would be useful to have some userfaultfd testcases in tools/testing/selftests/. Partly as an aid to arch maintainers when enabling this. And also as a standalone thing to give people a practical way of exercising this interface. What are your thoughts on enabling userfaultfd for other architectures, btw? Are there good use cases, are people working on it, etc? Also, I assume a manpage is in the works? Sooner rather than later would be good - Michael's review of proposed kernel interfaces has often been valuable.