From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55351) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxDRB-0000xr-J7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 07:54:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxDR6-00029t-Iw for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 07:54:25 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:55002) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxDR6-00029p-Bp for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 26 May 2015 07:54:20 -0400 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t4QBsJ5m022649 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=FAIL) for ; Tue, 26 May 2015 07:54:19 -0400 Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 19:54:16 +0800 From: Fam Zheng Message-ID: <20150526115416.GV13749@ad.nay.redhat.com> References: <1430152117-100558-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1430152117-100558-24-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1430152117-100558-24-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 23/29] bitmap: add atomic set functions List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com, mst@redhat.com On Mon, 04/27 18:28, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > From: Stefan Hajnoczi > > Use atomic_or() for atomic bitmaps where several threads may set bits at > the same time. This avoids the race condition between threads loading > an element, bitwise ORing, and then storing the element. > > When setting all bits in a word we can avoid atomic ops and instead just > use an smp_mb() at the end. > > Most bitmap users don't need atomicity so introduce new functions. > > Signed-off-by: Stefan Hajnoczi > Message-Id: <1417519399-3166-2-git-send-email-stefanha@redhat.com> > [Avoid barrier in the single word case, use full barrier instead of write. > - Paolo] > Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini > --- > include/qemu/bitmap.h | 2 ++ > include/qemu/bitops.h | 14 ++++++++++++++ > util/bitmap.c | 37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ > 3 files changed, 53 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/include/qemu/bitmap.h b/include/qemu/bitmap.h > index f0273c9..3e0a4f3 100644 > --- a/include/qemu/bitmap.h > +++ b/include/qemu/bitmap.h > @@ -39,6 +39,7 @@ > * bitmap_empty(src, nbits) Are all bits zero in *src? > * bitmap_full(src, nbits) Are all bits set in *src? > * bitmap_set(dst, pos, nbits) Set specified bit area > + * bitmap_set_atomic(dst, pos, nbits) Set specified bit area with atomic ops > * bitmap_clear(dst, pos, nbits) Clear specified bit area > * bitmap_find_next_zero_area(buf, len, pos, n, mask) Find bit free area > */ > @@ -226,6 +227,7 @@ static inline int bitmap_intersects(const unsigned long *src1, > } > > void bitmap_set(unsigned long *map, long i, long len); > +void bitmap_set_atomic(unsigned long *map, long i, long len); > void bitmap_clear(unsigned long *map, long start, long nr); > unsigned long bitmap_find_next_zero_area(unsigned long *map, > unsigned long size, > diff --git a/include/qemu/bitops.h b/include/qemu/bitops.h > index 90ca8df..95f98fb 100644 > --- a/include/qemu/bitops.h > +++ b/include/qemu/bitops.h > @@ -16,6 +16,7 @@ > #include > > #include "host-utils.h" > +#include "atomic.h" > > #define BITS_PER_BYTE CHAR_BIT > #define BITS_PER_LONG (sizeof (unsigned long) * BITS_PER_BYTE) > @@ -39,6 +40,19 @@ static inline void set_bit(long nr, unsigned long *addr) > } > > /** > + * set_bit_atomic - Set a bit in memory atomically > + * @nr: the bit to set > + * @addr: the address to start counting from > + */ > +static inline void set_bit_atomic(long nr, unsigned long *addr) > +{ > + unsigned long mask = BIT_MASK(nr); > + unsigned long *p = addr + BIT_WORD(nr); > + > + atomic_or(p, mask); > +} > + > +/** > * clear_bit - Clears a bit in memory > * @nr: Bit to clear > * @addr: Address to start counting from > diff --git a/util/bitmap.c b/util/bitmap.c > index 9c6bb52..6838d49 100644 > --- a/util/bitmap.c > +++ b/util/bitmap.c > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ > > #include "qemu/bitops.h" > #include "qemu/bitmap.h" > +#include "qemu/atomic.h" > > /* > * bitmaps provide an array of bits, implemented using an an > @@ -177,6 +178,42 @@ void bitmap_set(unsigned long *map, long start, long nr) > } > } > > +void bitmap_set_atomic(unsigned long *map, long start, long nr) > +{ > + unsigned long *p = map + BIT_WORD(start); > + const long size = start + nr; s/size/end/ ? Otherwise, Reviewed-by: Fam Zheng > + int bits_to_set = BITS_PER_LONG - (start % BITS_PER_LONG); > + unsigned long mask_to_set = BITMAP_FIRST_WORD_MASK(start); > + > + /* First word */ > + if (nr - bits_to_set > 0) { > + atomic_or(p, mask_to_set); > + nr -= bits_to_set; > + bits_to_set = BITS_PER_LONG; > + mask_to_set = ~0UL; > + p++; > + } > + > + /* Full words */ > + while (nr - bits_to_set >= 0) { > + *p = ~0UL; > + nr -= bits_to_set; > + mask_to_set = ~0UL; > + p++; > + } For full words, will memset be faster by any chance? > + > + /* Last word */ > + if (nr) { > + mask_to_set &= BITMAP_LAST_WORD_MASK(size); > + atomic_or(p, mask_to_set); > + } else { > + /* If we avoided the full barrier in atomic_or(), issue a > + * barrier to account for the assignments in the while loop. > + */ > + smp_mb(); > + } > +} > + > void bitmap_clear(unsigned long *map, long start, long nr) > { > unsigned long *p = map + BIT_WORD(start); > -- > 1.8.3.1 > >