From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52953) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxxnO-0003oO-N6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:24:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxxnK-0005GO-1L for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:24:26 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:47291) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YxxnJ-0005GI-Lh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 May 2015 09:24:21 -0400 Received: from int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx13.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.26]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B7E33D7F19 for ; Thu, 28 May 2015 13:24:21 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 15:24:18 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150528152225-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1430133591-6197-1-git-send-email-ghammer@redhat.com> <1430133591-6197-5-git-send-email-ghammer@redhat.com> <5566ED24.3060205@redhat.com> <5567030D.8050606@redhat.com> <20150528141210-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <55671184.30300@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55671184.30300@redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V15 4/5] i386: add a Virtual Machine Generation ID device List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Paolo Bonzini Cc: Gal Hammer , imammedo@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 03:00:52PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote: > > > On 28/05/2015 14:21, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > > And the way I can fix it would be...? Is there another memory region I can > > > use? > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > Gal. > > > > I think we hammered out an interesting alternative off-list: get hold of > > some AddressRegionNVS memory and copy data from MMIO or port io over > > there when you get an interrupt. > > That doesn't work because there's no way to get the base address of a > DataTableRegion. > > You could use a linker ADD_POINTER command, but it wouldn't work for > UEFI. Hmm why not? UEFI runs these as well. > So I think it's best to just stay with this one. If we do find > something better we can always change it later. > > Paolo