From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39807)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1YzP2b-0004pg-K8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 08:42:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1YzP2Y-0007sQ-AO
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 08:42:05 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:33375)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1YzP2X-0007sB-UA
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 08:42:02 -0400
Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 14:41:58 +0200
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150601144015-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
References: <20150531181048.GC5268@redhat.com> <556C046B.9070704@redhat.com>
	<20150601092645-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<556C1F63.1090605@redhat.com>
	<20150601121908-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<556C3757.7080603@redhat.com>
	<20150601124604-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<556C417D.4050707@redhat.com>
	<20150601143447-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<556C5275.7010702@redhat.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <556C5275.7010702@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V4 4/4] fw_cfg: insert fw_cfg file blobs
	via qemu cmdline
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: matt.fleming@intel.com, "Gabriel L. Somlo" <somlo@cmu.edu>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, gsomlo@gmail.com, kraxel@redhat.com, Laszlo Ersek <lersek@redhat.com>

On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:39:17PM +0200, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> 
> 
> On 01/06/2015 14:38, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > I'm sorry - I don't understand. It's easy to do the right thing.  Just
> > add the opt prefix. Why insist on user doing the right thing, and punish
> > violations with failing at random?
> > 
> > If it's useful for developers somehow, add a config flag for that.
> 
> You've already been explained that config flags are not an answer.
> 
> Paolo


Oh then just #define FW_CFG_USER_PREFIX "opt/".

Developers can edit that to "" if they want to play.