From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55190) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzPjo-00078g-Kn for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:26:45 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzPjk-0000fW-1q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:26:44 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:50805) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1YzPjj-0000fH-Tb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 01 Jun 2015 09:26:39 -0400 Received: from int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.23]) by mx1.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 720DB2D8B55 for ; Mon, 1 Jun 2015 13:26:39 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 1 Jun 2015 15:26:36 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150601150457-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <1432568042-19553-1-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> <1432568042-19553-24-git-send-email-marcel@redhat.com> <20150531181221.GJ5268@redhat.com> <556C2985.9000909@redhat.com> <1433158819.19671.23.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <20150601141532-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1433161442.19671.27.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> <20150601142654-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <1433163422.19671.33.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1433163422.19671.33.camel@nilsson.home.kraxel.org> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V7 23/24] apci: fix PXB behaviour if used with unsupported BIOS List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Gerd Hoffmann Cc: Marcel Apfelbaum , pbonzini@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Jun 01, 2015 at 02:57:02PM +0200, Gerd Hoffmann wrote: > Hi, > > > > Devices behind pxb wouldn't be working because they didn't got resources > > > assigned, yes. > > > > I mean that there's no way to get old seabios+pxb when bisecting. > > When bisecting in qemu (with bundled seabios) yes. > But when bisection in seabios ... > > Anyway, at the end of the day it doesn't matter much why exactly the > firmware didn't setup the pxb. I think that qemu should handle that > case gracefully no matter what. > > cheers, > Gerd > Testing end>base is fine. What worries me is the !base test which isn't really coming from spec since 0 is a valid pci address. Do things still work if we drop that one? -- MST