From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57343)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1Z0LWs-00033y-Hy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:09:15 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1Z0LWp-00026b-B7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:09:14 -0400
Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:33372)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>) id 1Z0LWo-00025L-LP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Jun 2015 23:09:11 -0400
Received: from /spool/local
	by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use
	Only! Violators will be prosecuted
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org> from <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>;
	Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:39:04 +0530
Received: from d28relay05.in.ibm.com (d28relay05.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.62])
	by d28dlp02.in.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D369394005B
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu,  4 Jun 2015 08:39:01 +0530 (IST)
Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (d28av01.in.ibm.com [9.184.220.63])
	by d28relay05.in.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id
	t5438urR12779596
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:38:57 +0530
Received: from d28av01.in.ibm.com (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by d28av01.in.ibm.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/NCO v10.0 AVout) with ESMTP id
	t5438uWm016121
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:38:56 +0530
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 08:38:54 +0530
From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Message-ID: <20150604030854.GA32292@in.ibm.com>
References: <1432184528-31252-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
	<20150529022715.GB597@in.ibm.com>
	<CAEgOgz5nFimM=H4aQ3WJZxSeN_UEeNG0q5y3qxPuaNxAT59OGA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAEgOgz5nFimM=H4aQ3WJZxSeN_UEeNG0q5y3qxPuaNxAT59OGA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/3] Bitmap based CPU enumeration
Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Crosthwaite <peter.crosthwaite@xilinx.com>
Cc: zhugh.fnst@cn.fujitsu.com, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org Developers" <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>, Andreas =?iso-8859-1?Q?F=E4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>, David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>

On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 09:59:38PM -0700, Peter Crosthwaite wrote:
> On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 7:27 PM, Bharata B Rao
> <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> > All the comments have been addressed and the series has been reviewed
> > by David, Eduardo and Igor. Can this series be taken in now ?
> >
> 
> Andreas' comment on P3 looks unaddressed. I think it can be handled by
> just putting that one sentance explanation you gave in commit message,
> or if its far enough out of scope just drop the change.
> 
> I think Igor's comment was an out of scope suggestion in the end so
> nothing needed there?
> 
> Regards,
> Peter
> 
> P.S. I am not the maintainer but I need to rebase on you for one of my
> patch sets so I'd like to help see this though!

Should I be rebasing against latest master or anyone else's tree to make
it easier for inclusion ?

Regards,
Bharata.