From: Luiz Capitulino <lcapitulino@redhat.com>
To: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, afaerber@suse.de
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Ping: [PATCH] qobject: object_property_add() performance improvement
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2015 09:06:57 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150604090657.13043243@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <012f01d09e99$016ab660$04402320$@samsung.com>
On Thu, 04 Jun 2015 10:35:17 +0300
Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com> wrote:
> Hello Luiz! Have you missed this ?
Well, this is a QOM patch. QOM also has an object abstraction, but
it's not the same as QObject.
I'm CC'ing the maintainer.
>
> Kind regards,
> Pavel Fedin
> Expert Engineer
> Samsung Electronics Research center Russia
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: qemu-devel-bounces+p.fedin=samsung.com@nongnu.org [mailto:qemu-devel-
> > bounces+p.fedin=samsung.com@nongnu.org] On Behalf Of Pavel Fedin
> > Sent: Thursday, May 28, 2015 11:42 AM
> > To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> > Cc: 'Luiz Capitulino'
> > Subject: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qobject: object_property_add() performance improvement
> >
> > The function originally behaves very badly when adding properties with "[*]" suffix.
> > Nomnally these are used for numbering IRQ pins. In order to find the correct starting
> > number the function started from zero and checked for duplicates. This took incredibly
> > long time with large number of CPUs because number of IRQ pins on some architectures
> (like
> > ARM GICv3) gets multiplied by number of CPUs.
> > The solution is to add one more property which caches last used index so that
> duplication
> > check is not repeated thousands of times. Every time an array is expanded the index is
> > picked up from this cache. Cache property is a uint32_t and has the original name of the
> > array ('name[*]') for simplicity.
> > Some more improvements:
> > - Call object_property_add_single() instead of recursing into itself - keeps off
> memcmp()
> > check every time when its result is already known.
> > - Allocate name_no_array only once and not every time for every property (there can be
> > thousands of them)
> > The modification decreases qemu startup time with 32 ARMv8 CPUs by a factor of 2 (~10
> sec
> > vs ~20 sec).
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Pavel Fedin <p.fedin@samsung.com>
> > ---
> > qom/object.c | 89 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
> > 1 file changed, 62 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/qom/object.c b/qom/object.c
> > index b8dff43..72480bc 100644
> > --- a/qom/object.c
> > +++ b/qom/object.c
> > @@ -10,6 +10,8 @@
> > * See the COPYING file in the top-level directory.
> > */
> >
> > +#include <glib/gprintf.h>
> > +
> > #include "qom/object.h"
> > #include "qemu-common.h"
> > #include "qapi/visitor.h"
> > @@ -721,35 +723,14 @@ void object_unref(Object *obj)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > -ObjectProperty *
> > -object_property_add(Object *obj, const char *name, const char *type,
> > - ObjectPropertyAccessor *get,
> > - ObjectPropertyAccessor *set,
> > - ObjectPropertyRelease *release,
> > - void *opaque, Error **errp)
> > +static ObjectProperty *
> > +object_property_add_single(Object *obj, const char *name, const char *type,
> > + ObjectPropertyAccessor *get,
> > + ObjectPropertyAccessor *set,
> > + ObjectPropertyRelease *release,
> > + void *opaque, Error **errp)
> > {
> > ObjectProperty *prop;
> > - size_t name_len = strlen(name);
> > -
> > - if (name_len >= 3 && !memcmp(name + name_len - 3, "[*]", 4)) {
> > - int i;
> > - ObjectProperty *ret;
> > - char *name_no_array = g_strdup(name);
> > -
> > - name_no_array[name_len - 3] = '\0';
> > - for (i = 0; ; ++i) {
> > - char *full_name = g_strdup_printf("%s[%d]", name_no_array, i);
> > -
> > - ret = object_property_add(obj, full_name, type, get, set,
> > - release, opaque, NULL);
> > - g_free(full_name);
> > - if (ret) {
> > - break;
> > - }
> > - }
> > - g_free(name_no_array);
> > - return ret;
> > - }
> >
> > QTAILQ_FOREACH(prop, &obj->properties, node) {
> > if (strcmp(prop->name, name) == 0) {
> > @@ -774,6 +755,60 @@ object_property_add(Object *obj, const char *name, const char
> *type,
> > return prop;
> > }
> >
> > +static void property_get_uint32_ptr(Object *obj, Visitor *v,
> > + void *opaque, const char *name,
> > + Error **errp);
> > +
> > +ObjectProperty *
> > +object_property_add(Object *obj, const char *name, const char *type,
> > + ObjectPropertyAccessor *get,
> > + ObjectPropertyAccessor *set,
> > + ObjectPropertyRelease *release,
> > + void *opaque, Error **errp)
> > +{
> > + size_t name_len = strlen(name);
> > +
> > + if (name_len >= 3 && !memcmp(name + name_len - 3, "[*]", 4)) {
> > + int i;
> > + ObjectProperty *ret, *count;
> > + /* 10 characters for maximum possible integer number */
> > + char *name_no_array = g_malloc(name_len + 10);
> > +
> > + count = object_property_find(obj, name, NULL);
> > + if (count == NULL) {
> > + void *v = g_malloc0(sizeof(uint32_t));
> > +
> > + /* This is the same as object_property_add_uint32_ptr(), but:
> > + * - Slightly faster and returns pointer
> > + * - Will not recurse here so that we can use
> > + * raw name with [*] here */
> > + count = object_property_add_single(obj, name, "uint32",
> > + property_get_uint32_ptr, NULL,
> > + NULL, v, &error_abort);
> > + }
> > +
> > + name_len -= 2;
> > + memcpy(name_no_array, name, name_len);
> > +
> > + for (i = *((uint32_t *)count->opaque); ; ++i) {
> > + g_sprintf(&name_no_array[name_len], "%d]", i);
> > +
> > + ret = object_property_add_single(obj, name_no_array, type, get, set,
> > + release, opaque, NULL);
> > + if (ret) {
> > + break;
> > + }
> > + }
> > + *((uint32_t *)count->opaque) = i + 1;
> > +
> > + g_free(name_no_array);
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + return object_property_add_single(obj, name, type,
> > + get, set, release, opaque, errp);
> > +}
> > +
> > ObjectProperty *object_property_find(Object *obj, const char *name,
> > Error **errp)
> > {
> > --
> > 1.9.5.msysgit.0
> >
>
>
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-04 13:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-04 7:35 [Qemu-devel] Ping: [PATCH] qobject: object_property_add() performance improvement Pavel Fedin
2015-06-04 8:07 ` Peter Crosthwaite
2015-06-04 10:01 ` Pavel Fedin
2015-06-04 13:06 ` Luiz Capitulino [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150604090657.13043243@redhat.com \
--to=lcapitulino@redhat.com \
--cc=afaerber@suse.de \
--cc=p.fedin@samsung.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).