From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40628) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0liX-0005QB-2p for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 03:07:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0liT-0006bL-PB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 03:07:01 -0400 Received: from e28smtp02.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.2]:35555) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z0liT-0006am-4t for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 05 Jun 2015 03:06:57 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp02.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:36:51 +0530 Date: Fri, 5 Jun 2015 12:36:31 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Message-ID: <20150605070630.GB25832@in.ibm.com> References: <1433478358-993-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1433478358-993-5-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <55713D2C.8040503@ozlabs.ru> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <55713D2C.8040503@ozlabs.ru> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 4/8] spapr: Reorganize CPU dt generation code Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Alexey Kardashevskiy Cc: thuth@redhat.com, mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, agraf@suse.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On Fri, Jun 05, 2015 at 04:09:48PM +1000, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote: > > > >- ret = fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,pft-size", > >- pft_size_prop, sizeof(pft_size_prop)); > > You broke formatting here, above 8 lines should not be in the patch. You mean above 80 chars ? It is not above 80 chars. > >+ _FDT((fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "d-cache-block-size", > >+ env->dcache_line_size))); > > Wrong indent. checkpatch.pl doesn't complain, but should we start the second line below ( of the first line ? Regards, Bharata.