From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37669)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Z2FNv-0001gx-VG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 04:59:52 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <kwolf@redhat.com>) id 1Z2FNu-0007Al-Vr
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 04:59:51 -0400
Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 10:59:42 +0200
From: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150609085942.GA4329@noname.str.redhat.com>
References: <1426791197-7793-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com>
	<CAJSP0QW2Tf5vhStBrLdMFWKHtodJLiof6mzGoczG1UsQvYa-7w@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAJSP0QW2Tf5vhStBrLdMFWKHtodJLiof6mzGoczG1UsQvYa-7w@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 0/2] block: driver should
 override flags in bdrv_open()
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@gmail.com>
Cc: qemu block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>, qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>

Am 09.06.2015 um 10:41 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben:
> On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com> wrote:
> > BDRV_O_PROTOCOL is an internal qemu flag which a user should be able to
> > override by explicitly specifying a block driver. This series implements
> > this and adds two iotests (one for NBD, one for file) to test it.
> >
> >
> > v2 (rebase on current master):
> > - Patch 1: Conflict in iotest 051's reference output (in a line that is
> >   removed by this patch anyway)
> >
> >
> > git-backport-diff against v1:
> >
> > Key:
> > [----] : patches are identical
> > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream patch
> > [down] : patch is downstream-only
> > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, respectively
> >
> > 001/2:[0002] [FC] 'block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open()'
> > 002/2:[----] [-C] 'iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL'
> >
> >
> > Max Reitz (2):
> >   block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open()
> >   iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL
> >
> >  block.c                    | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/051     |  1 -
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/051.out |  3 ---
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/119     | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/119.out | 11 ++++++++
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/120     | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/120.out | 15 +++++++++++
> >  tests/qemu-iotests/group   |  2 ++
> >  8 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/119
> >  create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/119.out
> >  create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/120
> >  create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/120.out
> 
> Please resend and CC Kevin (for qemu-iotests and block.c).

It's only you who dropped me from CC. :-)

I know, I should finally make up my mind about this series...

Kevin