From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38306) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2GdZ-0005Vz-V2 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:20:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z2GdW-0004p8-3y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 09 Jun 2015 06:20:05 -0400 Date: Tue, 9 Jun 2015 11:19:58 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20150609101958.GA27900@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <1426791197-7793-1-git-send-email-mreitz@redhat.com> <20150609085942.GA4329@noname.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150609085942.GA4329@noname.str.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] [PATCH v2 0/2] block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: qemu block , qemu-devel , Stefan Hajnoczi , Max Reitz --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jun 09, 2015 at 10:59:42AM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 09.06.2015 um 10:41 hat Stefan Hajnoczi geschrieben: > > On Thu, Mar 19, 2015 at 6:53 PM, Max Reitz wrote: > > > BDRV_O_PROTOCOL is an internal qemu flag which a user should be able = to > > > override by explicitly specifying a block driver. This series impleme= nts > > > this and adds two iotests (one for NBD, one for file) to test it. > > > > > > > > > v2 (rebase on current master): > > > - Patch 1: Conflict in iotest 051's reference output (in a line that = is > > > removed by this patch anyway) > > > > > > > > > git-backport-diff against v1: > > > > > > Key: > > > [----] : patches are identical > > > [####] : number of functional differences between upstream/downstream= patch > > > [down] : patch is downstream-only > > > The flags [FC] indicate (F)unctional and (C)ontextual differences, re= spectively > > > > > > 001/2:[0002] [FC] 'block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open()' > > > 002/2:[----] [-C] 'iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL' > > > > > > > > > Max Reitz (2): > > > block: driver should override flags in bdrv_open() > > > iotests: Add tests for overriding BDRV_O_PROTOCOL > > > > > > block.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++------------- > > > tests/qemu-iotests/051 | 1 - > > > tests/qemu-iotests/051.out | 3 --- > > > tests/qemu-iotests/119 | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/119.out | 11 ++++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/120 | 65 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++= ++++++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/120.out | 15 +++++++++++ > > > tests/qemu-iotests/group | 2 ++ > > > 8 files changed, 184 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > > create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/119 > > > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/119.out > > > create mode 100755 tests/qemu-iotests/120 > > > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/120.out > >=20 > > Please resend and CC Kevin (for qemu-iotests and block.c). >=20 > It's only you who dropped me from CC. :-) For sanity, can you check whether you are on the CC list in Max's second ping message: 556F5A4D.50903@redhat.com? I had another CC mix-up recently and want to check whether my mail tools are dropping CCs or if it's just me being confused. Thanks, Stefan --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVdr3OAAoJEJykq7OBq3PIboQIAIf+k0lHWECwFzpKQAvgBuWy ckdgHA5trPiq7OBO10al0+p3CFRFHKHMCFIedz/dV94J16suq/dl3sZlJB4oM/Vd 4FIGVwoiTkLvnFpc6vPeFIswfbWqXPw+B61tz0C6YXGYevx9CMohr+nlrp+2+dc8 S+5jDOgKiGht4Yq4J+Loz3T5jfqSUtojxET0I7Yyz+/HfjbzrccVR0GoqG0iRnw/ KfRH71hyu65IwjJT5C+rrO5h+6Ks6CkNR/O9eU3fy9RHSOCn6BVMhj4Rk/m8u+CF SvafvGRBdKepbtOT+YZzb5B/HAk4uAK7hZq8pzyi4zA7Fa8Tbeau5E4YHs2d9r4= =gAZx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --+HP7ph2BbKc20aGI--