From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jeff Cody <jcody@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, qemu-stable@nongnu.org,
pbonzini@redhat.com, jsnow@redhat.com, wangxiaolong@ucloud.cn
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/8] block: Mirror discarded sectors
Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2015 16:29:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150611082911.GB22459@ad.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150608130242.GE1961@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com>
On Mon, 06/08 14:02, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 01:56:06PM +0800, Fam Zheng wrote:
> > v7: Fix the lost assignment of s->unmap.
> >
> > v6: Fix pnum in bdrv_get_block_status_above. [Paolo]
> >
> > v5: Rewrite patch 1.
> > Address Eric's comments on patch 3.
> > Add Eric's rev-by to patches 2 & 4.
> > Check BDRV_BLOCK_DATA in patch 3. [Paolo]
> >
> > This fixes the mirror assert failure reported by wangxiaolong:
> >
> > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2015-04/msg04458.html
> >
> > The direct cause is that hbitmap code couldn't handle unset of bits *after*
> > iterator's current position. We could fix that, but the bdrv_reset_dirty() call
> > is more questionable:
> >
> > Before, if guest discarded some sectors during migration, it could see
> > different data after moving to dest side, depending on block backends of the
> > src and the dest. This is IMO worse than mirroring the actual reading as done
> > in this series, because we don't know what the guest is doing.
> >
> > For example if a guest first issues WRITE SAME to wipe out the area then issues
> > UNMAP to discard it, just to get rid of some sensitive data completely, we may
> > miss both operations and leave stale data on dest image.
> >
> >
> > Fam Zheng (8):
> > block: Add bdrv_get_block_status_above
> > qmp: Add optional bool "unmap" to drive-mirror
> > mirror: Do zero write on target if sectors not allocated
> > block: Fix dirty bitmap in bdrv_co_discard
> > block: Remove bdrv_reset_dirty
> > qemu-iotests: Make block job methods common
> > qemu-iotests: Add test case for mirror with unmap
> > iotests: Use event_wait in wait_ready
> >
> > block.c | 12 --------
> > block/io.c | 60 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------
> > block/mirror.c | 28 +++++++++++++++---
> > blockdev.c | 5 ++++
> > hmp.c | 2 +-
> > include/block/block.h | 4 +++
> > include/block/block_int.h | 4 +--
> > qapi/block-core.json | 8 +++++-
> > qmp-commands.hx | 3 ++
> > tests/qemu-iotests/041 | 66 ++++++++++---------------------------------
> > tests/qemu-iotests/132 | 59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > tests/qemu-iotests/132.out | 5 ++++
> > tests/qemu-iotests/group | 1 +
> > tests/qemu-iotests/iotests.py | 23 +++++++++++++++
> > 14 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 84 deletions(-)
> > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/132
> > create mode 100644 tests/qemu-iotests/132.out
> >
> > --
> > 2.4.2
> >
>
> Thanks, applied to my block tree:
> https://github.com/stefanha/qemu/commits/block
Stefan,
The only controversial patches are the qmp/drive-mirror ones (1-3), while
patches 4-8 are still useful on their own: they fix the mentioned crash and
improve iotests.
Shall we merge the second half (of course none of them depend on 1-3) now that
softfreeze is approaching?
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-06-11 8:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-06-08 5:56 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/8] block: Mirror discarded sectors Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/8] block: Add bdrv_get_block_status_above Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/8] qmp: Add optional bool "unmap" to drive-mirror Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 14:51 ` Eric Blake
2015-06-08 14:54 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/8] mirror: Do zero write on target if sectors not allocated Fam Zheng
2015-11-04 18:35 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-11-05 5:42 ` Fam Zheng
2015-11-05 9:55 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/8] block: Fix dirty bitmap in bdrv_co_discard Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/8] block: Remove bdrv_reset_dirty Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 6/8] qemu-iotests: Make block job methods common Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 7/8] qemu-iotests: Add test case for mirror with unmap Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 5:56 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 8/8] iotests: Use event_wait in wait_ready Fam Zheng
2015-06-08 13:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/8] block: Mirror discarded sectors Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-06-11 8:29 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-06-24 9:08 ` [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-stable] " Fam Zheng
2015-06-24 17:01 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-06-25 1:02 ` Fam Zheng
2015-06-25 10:45 ` Fam Zheng
2015-06-26 13:36 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2015-06-26 13:58 ` Alexandre DERUMIER
2015-06-29 1:03 ` Fam Zheng
2015-06-26 13:19 ` [Qemu-devel] " Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150611082911.GB22459@ad.nay.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=jcody@redhat.com \
--cc=jsnow@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-stable@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=wangxiaolong@ucloud.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).