qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au>
To: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: agraf@suse.de, thuth@redhat.com, aik@ozlabs.ru,
	mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
	qemu-ppc@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/6] spapr_pci: enumerate and add PCI device tree
Date: Fri, 19 Jun 2015 11:48:40 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150619014840.GJ13352@voom.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87k2v2enfd.fsf@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4185 bytes --]

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:12:14PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> David Gibson <david@gibson.dropbear.id.au> writes:
> 
> > On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 04:32:26PM +0530, Nikunj A Dadhania wrote:
> >> All the PCI enumeration and device node creation was off-loaded to
> >> SLOF. With PCI hotplug support, code needed to be added to add device
> >> node. This creates multiple copy of the code one in SLOF and other in
> >> hotplug code. To unify this, the patch adds the pci device node
> >> creation in Qemu. For backward compatibility, a flag
> >> "qemu,phb-enumerated" is added to the phb, suggesting to SLOF to not
> >> do device node creation.
> >> 
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> [ Squashed Michael's drc_index changes ]
> >> Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> Signed-off-by: Nikunj A Dadhania <nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> >> ---
> >>  hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c | 167 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
> >>  1 file changed, 142 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
> >> 
> >> diff --git a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> >> index 33254b3..6ef7f44 100644
> >> --- a/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> >> +++ b/hw/ppc/spapr_pci.c
> >> @@ -23,6 +23,7 @@
> >>   * THE SOFTWARE.
> >>   */
> >>  #include "hw/hw.h"
> >> +#include "hw/sysbus.h"
> >>  #include "hw/pci/pci.h"
> >>  #include "hw/pci/msi.h"
> >>  #include "hw/pci/msix.h"
> >> @@ -35,6 +36,7 @@
> >>  #include "qemu/error-report.h"
> >>  #include "qapi/qmp/qerror.h"
> >>  
> >> +#include "hw/pci/pci_bridge.h"
> >>  #include "hw/pci/pci_bus.h"
> >>  #include "hw/ppc/spapr_drc.h"
> >>  #include "sysemu/device_tree.h"
> >> @@ -946,8 +948,13 @@ static int spapr_populate_pci_child_dt(PCIDevice *dev, void *fdt, int offset,
> >>       * processed by OF beforehand
> >>       */
> >>      _FDT(fdt_setprop_string(fdt, offset, "name", "pci"));
> >> -    _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,loc-code", drc_name, strlen(drc_name)));
> >> -    _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "ibm,my-drc-index", drc_index));
> >> +    if (drc_name) {
> >> +        _FDT(fdt_setprop(fdt, offset, "ibm,loc-code", drc_name,
> >> +                         strlen(drc_name)));
> >> +    }
> >> +    if (drc_index) {
> >> +        _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "ibm,my-drc-index", drc_index));
> >> +    }
> >>  
> >>      _FDT(fdt_setprop_cell(fdt, offset, "#address-cells",
> >>                            RESOURCE_CELLS_ADDRESS));
> >> @@ -964,30 +971,38 @@ static int spapr_populate_pci_child_dt(PCIDevice *dev, void *fdt, int offset,
> >>      return 0;
> >>  }
> >>  
> >> +typedef struct sPAPRFDT {
> >> +    void *fdt;
> >> +    int node_off;
> >> +    sPAPRPHBState *sphb;
> >> +} sPAPRFDT;
> >
> > I don't really like this structure - it seems a very ad-hoc collection
> > of things.  Even though it means there will be a lot of parameters to
> > the function, I'd prefer passing them separately to
> > spapr_create_pci_child_dt() rather than using this structure.
> 
> I added this structure with pci_for_each_device() in mind, which has
> following prototype.
> 
>     void pci_for_each_device(PCIBus *bus, int bus_num,
>                              void (*fn)(PCIBus *bus, PCIDevice *d, void *opaque),
>                              void *opaque);
> 
> So per device we get this structure and populate PCI device tree entry
> and scan and populate bridge recursively if needed. So I had continued
> using this structure in spapr_create_pci_child_dt().
> 
> We cannot remove sPAPRFDT completely as we need it for PCI device tree
> creation.

Ah, yes, I see.

> So if needed, I can change spapr_create_pci_child_dt() with more args.
> And structure sPAPRFDT to be used by spapr_populate_pci_devices_dt()
> called by pci_for_each_device().

Ok, I'd still prefer to see this structure localized to just the
callback function.  Which  see you've done in the next spin, thanks.

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2015-06-19  6:02 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-06-11 11:02 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/6] spapr_pci: DT field fixes and PCI DT node creation in QEMU Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-11 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 1/6] spapr_pci: encode missing 64-bit memory address space Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-17  6:49   ` David Gibson
2015-06-11 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 2/6] spapr_pci: encode class code including Prog IF register Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-17  6:50   ` David Gibson
2015-06-11 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 3/6] spapr_pci: enumerate and add PCI device tree Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-17  6:49   ` David Gibson
2015-06-17  8:42     ` Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-19  1:48       ` David Gibson [this message]
2015-06-11 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 4/6] spapr_pci: set device node unit address as hex Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-17  6:51   ` David Gibson
2015-06-11 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 5/6] spapr_pci: populate ibm,loc-code Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-11 11:02 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 6/6] spapr_pci: drop redundant args in spapr_populate_pci_child_dt Nikunj A Dadhania
2015-06-18  6:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v7 0/6] spapr_pci: DT field fixes and PCI DT node creation in QEMU David Gibson

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150619014840.GJ13352@voom.redhat.com \
    --to=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
    --cc=agraf@suse.de \
    --cc=aik@ozlabs.ru \
    --cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=nikunj@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
    --cc=thuth@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).