From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60913) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7QLD-0008V6-70 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:42:31 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7QL7-000224-Jq for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:42:27 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:54862) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z7QL7-00021w-78 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 23 Jun 2015 11:42:21 -0400 Date: Tue, 23 Jun 2015 17:42:18 +0200 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150623154217.GA15245@redhat.com> References: <1433762257-1752411-1-git-send-email-stefanb@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150623135234.GA13199@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4 0/4] Extend TPM support with a QEMU-external TPM List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Berger Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quan.xu@intel.com, Stefan Berger On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:37:02AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > "Michael S. Tsirkin" wrote on 06/23/2015 09:52:34 AM: > > > From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" > > To: Stefan Berger > > Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, quan.xu@intel.com, Stefan Berger/Watson/IBM@IBMUS > > Date: 06/23/2015 09:52 AM > > Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Extend TPM support with a QEMU-external TPM > > > > On Mon, Jun 08, 2015 at 07:17:33AM -0400, Stefan Berger wrote: > > > The following series of patches extends TPM support with an > > > external TPM that offers a Linux CUSE (character device in userspace) > > > interface. This TPM lets each VM access its own private vTPM. > > > The CUSE TPM supports suspend/resume and migration. Much > > > out-of-band functionality necessary to control the CUSE TPM is > > > implemented using ioctls. > > > > So the problem is really review. I feel to judge this > > adequately I'd have to review cuse code too (since > > no one else did). And unfortunately I don't have the > > time to do this anytime soon. > > You mean the CUSE code in the kernel and client library? I mean swtpm in your tree. > > > > As far as I'm concerned, if anyone wants to review > > and merge these patches, pls go ahead, I have nothing > > against them. > > Sounds good. > > Stefan > > > > > -- > > MST > >