From: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
To: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexander Graf <agraf@suse.de>,
Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>,
"Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>,
Jens Freimann <jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Jason J. Herne" <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x/migration: Introduce 2.4 machine
Date: Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:33:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150701143357.5d6c731c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1435742217-62246-1-git-send-email-borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 11:16:57 +0200
Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> wrote:
> The section footer changes commit f68945d42bab ("Add a protective
> section footer") and commit 37fb569c0198 ("Disable section footers
> on older machine types") broke migration for any non-versioned
> machines.
>
> While one can argue that section footer should be enabled
> explicitely for new versions instead of disabled for old ones,
> this pinpoints to a problem of s390-ccw-machines: it needs to
> be versioned to be compatible with future changes in common
> code data structures such as section footers.
>
> Let's introduce a version scheme for s390-ccw-virtio machines.
> We will use the old s390-ccw-virtio name as alias to the latest
> version as all existing libvirt XML for the ccw type were expanded
> by libvirt to that name.
>
> The only downside of this patch is, that the old alias s390-ccw
> will no longer be available as machines can have only one alias,
> but it should not really matter.
>
> Cc: Dr. David Alan Gilbert <dgilbert@redhat.com>
> Cc: Juan Quintela <quintela@redhat.com>
> Cc: Boris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Jason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com>
> ---
> hw/s390x/s390-virtio-ccw.c | 22 ++++++++++++++++++----
> 1 file changed, 18 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
Adapted the commit message and applied (with minor tweaks) to my
s390-next branch at
git://github.com/cohuck/qemu s390-next
I'll probably send a pull request including this patch tomorrow, unless
someone has further comments.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-01 12:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-01 9:16 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/1] s390x/migration: Introduce 2.4 machine Christian Borntraeger
2015-07-01 9:56 ` Juan Quintela
2015-07-01 10:20 ` Christian Borntraeger
2015-07-01 11:10 ` Juan Quintela
2015-07-01 12:33 ` Cornelia Huck [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150701143357.5d6c731c.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--to=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=agraf@suse.de \
--cc=borntraeger@de.ibm.com \
--cc=dgilbert@redhat.com \
--cc=fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jfrei@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=quintela@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).