From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:39410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBFXQ-0004NA-Kz for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:58:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZBFXP-0006Vo-OJ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Jul 2015 00:58:52 -0400 Date: Sat, 4 Jul 2015 06:58:43 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig Message-ID: <20150704045843.GA31893@lst.de> References: <1434016899-18643-1-git-send-email-hch@lst.de> <55797E80.9050608@redhat.com> <20150617115924.GA10087@lst.de> <20150617122406.GE4202@noname.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150617122406.GE4202@noname.str.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Qemu-block] NVMe volatile write cache fixes List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Kevin Wolf Cc: Keith Busch , Christoph Hellwig , qemu-block@nongnu.org, "qemu-devel@nongnu.org" On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 02:24:06PM +0200, Kevin Wolf wrote: > Am 17.06.2015 um 13:59 hat Christoph Hellwig geschrieben: > > Thank Eric. > > > > Kevin, > > > > do you want me to resend the series with these cover letter/cc fixes or > > is it okay this time? > > It's not worth a respin. I'm just waiting for an Acked-by (or whatever > other outcome of a review) from Keith before I merge this. Given that you got the Ack a while ago is there any chance to get this data integrity fix in before qemu 2.4?