From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, pbonzini@redhat.com,
Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, stefanha@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] Set correct blk feature for virtio 1.0
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 14:49:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150715143130-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150715111118.4d383807.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 11:11:18AM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 13:29:56 +0800
> Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all:
> >
> > This series tries to set feature correctly for virtio-blk when virtio
> > 1.0 is supported. Two isssues were addressed according to the spec:
> >
> > - scsi passthrough was not support in 1.0. This is done by, 1) disable
> > scsi by defautl for 2.4 machine type and fail the initialization
> > when both scsi and 1.0 were set.
> > - any layout must be set for transitional device. This is done by set
> > any layout when 1.0 is supported.
> >
> > Please review
> >
> > Changes from V1:
> > - Split virtio-net changes out of the series
> > - Enable VIRTIO_BLK_F_SCSI only when scsi is set
> > - Disable scsi by default and compat it for legacy machine types
> > - Let get_features() can fail and fail the initialization of
> > virito-blk when both 1.0 and scsi were supported.
>
> Hm, this seems confusing to me mainly due to the different way
> transitional devices are handled by pci and ccw.
>
> For virtio-pci: (please correct me if I misunderstood)
> - devices (except input) are transitional by default
> - user can disable legacy or modern support
> - drivers can use method they prefer, depending on VERSION_1
>
> For virtio-ccw:
> - transitional means "in limbo" regarding legacy or modern
> - devices become legacy if features are read without negotiation of a
> revision, or if revision 0 is negotiated
> - they become modern if revision 1 is negotiated
>
> That implies that for ccw, a transitional device does not offer any
> features: It either transitions to the legacy or modern state if a
> revision was negotiated, or it becomes a legacy device by reading
> features (which are the legacy features, then). While pci has "real"
> transitional devices needing to offer a certain feature set.
>
> I'm not sure what the solution is here: basically, ccw needs a dynamic
> feature set, while pci does not.
I think the issue is theoretical since linux guests
do not read feature bits > 31 unless revision 1
is negotiated.
In any case, won't the following solve it nicely?
if (revision >= 1)
return d->host_features
else
return d->host_features & 0xffffffff;
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 11:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-15 5:29 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] Set correct blk feature for virtio 1.0 Jason Wang
2015-07-15 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 1/5] virtio: get_features() can fail Jason Wang
2015-07-15 9:01 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 9:11 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-15 11:36 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-22 15:13 ` Markus Armbruster
2015-07-15 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 2/5] virtio-blk: advertise scsi only when scsi is set Jason Wang
2015-07-15 7:57 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-15 8:31 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-15 8:33 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-15 5:29 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 3/5] virtio-blk: disable scsi passthrough by default Jason Wang
2015-07-15 12:21 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 12:47 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-15 14:14 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 14:18 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-15 14:28 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 14:45 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-10-14 10:29 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-10-14 15:58 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-15 5:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 4/5] virtio-blk: fail the init when both 1.0 and scsi is set Jason Wang
2015-07-15 5:30 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 5/5] virtio-blk: set VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT when 1.0 is supported Jason Wang
2015-07-15 9:11 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH V2 0/5] Set correct blk feature for virtio 1.0 Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 9:39 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-15 11:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 11:52 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 12:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 14:08 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 14:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 11:49 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-07-15 12:49 ` Cornelia Huck
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150715143130-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).