From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Cornelia Huck <cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org, Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>,
qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>,
pbonzini@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] virtio-blk: disable scsi passthrough for 1.0 device
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:39:18 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150715173508-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20150715163051.354798d6.cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com>
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:30:51PM +0200, Cornelia Huck wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Jul 2015 17:11:57 +0300
> "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > > > > > Fine, but revision is negotiated way before features are
> > > > > > probed so why does it make a practical difference?
> > > > >
> > > > > Legacy drivers (that don't know about the set-revision command) will
> > > > > read features without revision negotiation - we need to offer them the
> > > > > legacy feature set.
> > > >
> > > > Right. So simply do if (revision < 1) return features & 0xffffffff
> > > > and that will do this, will it not?
> > >
> > > Not for bits that we want to offer for legacy but not for modern.
> >
> > I don't think this selective offering works at least for scsi.
> > scsi is a backend feature, if you connect a modern device
> > in front the device simply does not work.
> > It therefore makes no sense to attach a transitional device
> > to such a backend.
>
> My point is that we're losing legacy features with that approach, and
> it would not be possible to offer them to legacy guests with newer
> qemus (at least with ccw).
What's wrong with adding a disable-modern flag, like pci has?
User can set that to get a legacy device.
> What about the other way around (i.e. scsi is configured, therefore the
> device is legacy-only)? We'd only retain the scsi bit if it is actually
> wanted by the user's configuration. I would need to enforce a max
> revision of 0 for such a device in ccw, and pci could disable modern
> for it.
Will have to think about it.
But I think a flag to disable/enable modern is useful in any case,
and it seems sufficient.
--
MST
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-15 14:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 50+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-13 5:46 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] virtio-pci: ignore unaligned read/write in virtio_address_space_read()/write() Jason Wang
2015-07-13 5:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 2/5] virtio-blk: disable scsi passthrough for 1.0 device Jason Wang
2015-07-13 7:46 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 9:00 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-13 9:56 ` Kevin Wolf
2015-07-13 11:51 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-13 12:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 12:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-13 12:36 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 13:20 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-13 14:34 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-13 14:41 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-13 15:13 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-13 15:35 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-14 17:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 10:59 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 11:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 12:01 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 12:43 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 13:16 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 13:40 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 14:11 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-15 14:30 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 14:39 ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2015-07-15 15:38 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-15 18:51 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-16 12:37 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-16 12:47 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-16 17:22 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-17 7:18 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-13 11:27 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 5:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 3/5] virtio-blk: set VIRTIO_F_ANY_LAYOUT when 1.0 is supported Jason Wang
2015-07-13 5:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 4/5] Revert "virtio-net: enable virtio 1.0" Jason Wang
2015-07-13 6:16 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-13 7:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 8:46 ` Cornelia Huck
2015-07-13 8:29 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-13 5:46 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 5/5] virtio-net: unbreak any layout Jason Wang
2015-07-13 6:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-13 8:30 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-13 7:24 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 8:22 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 10:54 ` Greg Kurz
2015-07-13 11:13 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 8:30 ` Jason Wang
2015-07-13 7:36 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/5] virtio-pci: ignore unaligned read/write in virtio_address_space_read()/write() Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 7:53 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-07-13 8:00 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2015-07-13 8:39 ` Gerd Hoffmann
2015-07-13 8:37 ` Jason Wang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150715173508-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com \
--to=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=cornelia.huck@de.ibm.com \
--cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).