From: Fam Zheng <famz@redhat.com>
To: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, lersek@redhat.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
stefanha@redhat.com, rjones@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] AioContext: fix broken placement of event_notifier_test_and_clear
Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2015 09:19:53 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150721011953.GA1950@ad.nay.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1108497253.1650856.1437396175024.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com>
On Mon, 07/20 08:42, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>
> > > I'm looking at optimizing it but I don't fully understand the relationship
> > > between aio_prepare and WaitForMultipleObjects. Do they get the same set of
> > > events?
> >
> > After some reading I think WaitForMultipleObjects is for event notifiers and
> > aio_prepare is for select() on fd events.
> > It's a bit trickier than aio-posix, in the first iteration there could be
> > another event masking ctx->notifier so we don't know if we need to clear it.
> > Maybe we can reverse events[] so that ctx->notifier will be the 0th one. And I
> > think we can always remove it after first iteration, am I right?
>
> Yes, that would work. I am not sure how complex it would be. You would also need
> a solution for the GSource and one (probably similar to aio-posix) for your
> epoll implementation. With ctx->notified at least you can encapsulate it in
> aio_notify_accept...
Yes, I'll take this into consideration when I refactor for epoll
implementation. For now I think aio_notify_accept is cleaner.
Fam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-07-21 1:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-07-20 5:27 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v2] AioContext: fix broken placement of event_notifier_test_and_clear Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-20 7:46 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-20 10:06 ` Fam Zheng
2015-07-20 12:42 ` [Qemu-devel] R: " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-21 1:19 ` Fam Zheng [this message]
2015-07-21 6:51 ` [Qemu-devel] " Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-20 16:36 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
2015-07-20 19:50 ` Paolo Bonzini
2015-07-21 11:04 ` Stefan Hajnoczi
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150721011953.GA1950@ad.nay.redhat.com \
--to=famz@redhat.com \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=lersek@redhat.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=rjones@redhat.com \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).