From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56140) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJfPE-0003g3-UH for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:13:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJfPB-0008T1-OZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:13:12 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x234.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::234]:33797) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZJfPB-0008Sw-GD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 06:13:09 -0400 Received: by wibud3 with SMTP id ud3so133190164wib.1 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2015 03:13:08 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2015 11:13:05 +0100 From: Stefan Hajnoczi Message-ID: <20150727101305.GD30018@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> References: <55AC9859.3050100@cn.fujitsu.com> <20150720103208.GA12675@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> <55ACE1B4.4010109@huawei.com> <55ADE316.1060704@siemens.com> <20150721094929.GD13993@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150721094929.GD13993@stefanha-thinkpad.redhat.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [POC] colo-proxy in qemu List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: zhanghailiang , Li Zhijian , Jan Kiszka , Jason Wang , qemu-devel , Vasiliy Tolstov , Dave Gilbert , "Gonglei (Arei)" , "Huangpeng (Peter)" , Yang Hongyang --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:49:29AM +0100, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 08:13:42AM +0200, Jan Kiszka wrote: > > On 2015-07-20 17:01, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote: > > > On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 2:12 PM, Vasiliy Tolstov wrote: > > >> 2015-07-20 14:55 GMT+03:00 zhanghailiang : > > >>> Agreed, besides, it is seemed that slirp is not supporting ipv6, we= also > > >>> have to supplement it. > > >> > > >> > > >> patch for ipv6 slirp support some times ago sended to qemu list, but= i > > >> don't know why in not accepted. > > >=20 > > > I think no one reviewed it but there was no objection against IPv6 > > > support in principle. > > >=20 > > > Jan: Can we merge slirp IPv6 support for QEMU 2.5? > >=20 > > Sorry, as I pointed out some time back, I don't have the bandwidth to > > look into slirp. Someone need to do a review, then send a pull request. >=20 > Do you want to remove yourself from the slirp section of the MAINTAINERS > file? >=20 > Going forward we'll need to find someone familiar with the QEMU > development process and with enough time to review slirp patches. Ping? I hoped this would raise some discussion and that maybe we could find a new maintainer or co-maintainer to get slirp moving. Any thoughts? Stefan --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJVtgQxAAoJEJykq7OBq3PIw6UH/A2oXFvWNMt5msn8+JTPvKj9 EvZaYTCHpkycqxI/X549tiMQ0FhtCc4lzBUvY9KKLP+xIRzQ3VV+lAbRECwoy2tu QgCT6f3yDvlNMWHjFfqip5h31+2ikGKfnuz+QjcN6ctRlafAZJAszBVRxCd0pLRf bIZZMI9Z9Yvp2CpHStijTSnM4WwCHrFkjJNEWSNYA3M0GEz7owvpY1p5lEnj0QST i0VjJOPo5W40UZqFMxqB2O0f+2rmKlSNZBy9eVVcY9+kkOTw8/aK6FVYZ3y7Cs6S 8EoKpsxC5i7P2hj6r6dgkotpFGZhKNDD68M6fsHg/6K3EtQOsuLrhxOKvV9+MXU= =KJI/ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --zbGR4y+acU1DwHSi--