From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46342) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKp8K-0005n6-N3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:48:36 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZKp8G-0006OT-QN for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:48:32 -0400 Date: Thu, 30 Jul 2015 10:48:24 -0400 From: Luiz Capitulino Message-ID: <20150730104824.1e87989d@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <87615biaux.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> References: <1435775149-17285-1-git-send-email-jsnow@redhat.com> <20150702113102.39ab42a5@redhat.com> <559BFF5B.4050405@redhat.com> <87615biaux.fsf@blackfin.pond.sub.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] qmp-shell: add documentation List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Markus Armbruster Cc: qemu-trivial@nongnu.org, mjt@tls.msk.ru, John Snow , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, 23 Jul 2015 09:36:38 +0200 Markus Armbruster wrote: > John Snow writes: > > > On 07/02/2015 11:31 AM, Luiz Capitulino wrote: > >> On Wed, 1 Jul 2015 14:25:49 -0400 > >> John Snow wrote: > >> > >>> I should probably document the changes that were made. > > John, what do you mean here? > > >>> Signed-off-by: John Snow > >> > >> Looks good to me, CC'ing maintainer. > > Luiz, is this a R-by? Reviewed-by: Luiz Capitulino This one is :) > > > Whoops, didn't realize Markus took this file over, too. Sorry Luiz. > > Don't worry about our maintainer reshuffling. > > > Markus, would you consider staging this? It's purely a documentation > > update for only a dev tool, so it doesn't really matter /when/ it lands > > either way, just shoring up some changes I made a while back to the > > interpreter here. > > > > tldr: "ping" > > I'm happy to include this in the next pull after it got reviewed. I'm > ignorant about qmp-shell, because I don't use it myself, so I'd have to > dig through it to verify your documentation is accurate and reasonably > complete. > > Fishing for more qualified reviewers: > > $ scripts/get_maintainer.pl --git-blame -f scripts/qmp/qmp-shell > Markus Armbruster (supporter:QMP) > Luiz Capitulino (authored lines:230/390=59%,commits:10/10=100%) > John Snow (authored lines:117/390=30%,commits:4/10=40%) > "Daniel P. Berrange" (authored lines:27/390=7%) > Eric Blake (commits:6/10=60%) > Stefan Hajnoczi (commits:2/10=20%) > Benoit Canet (commits:1/10=10%) > > Luiz, can you review for accuracy and reasonable completeness? > > Of course, I'm the reviewer of last resort for anything I maintain, > whether I understand it or not :) >