qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>
To: "Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com>
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.4] acpi: avoid potential uninitialized access to cpu_hp_io_base
Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 14:53:03 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150731145303.4bf5f2b6@nial.brq.redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1438337675-13252-1-git-send-email-berrange@redhat.com>

On Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:14:35 +0100
"Daniel P. Berrange" <berrange@redhat.com> wrote:

> When building QEMU with Mingw64 toolchain I see a warning
> 
>  CC    x86_64-softmmu/hw/i386/acpi-build.o
>   hw/i386/acpi-build.c: In function 'acpi_build':
>   hw/i386/acpi-build.c:1138:9: warning: 'pm.cpu_hp_io_base' may be used uninitialized in this function [-Wmaybe-uninitialized]
>            aml_append(crs,
>            ^
>   hw/i386/acpi-build.c:1666:16: note: 'pm.cpu_hp_io_base' was declared here
>        AcpiPmInfo pm;
>                   ^
> 
> In acpi_get_pm_info() some of the fields are pre-initialized
> to 0, but this one was missed.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrange <berrange@redhat.com>
Impossible in practice since piix or lpc branches will initialize it,
but there is no harm in making compiler happy.

Reviewed-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

> ---
>  hw/i386/acpi-build.c | 1 +
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> index 46eddb8..95e0c65 100644
> --- a/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> +++ b/hw/i386/acpi-build.c
> @@ -169,6 +169,7 @@ static void acpi_get_pm_info(AcpiPmInfo *pm)
>      Object *obj = NULL;
>      QObject *o;
>  
> +    pm->cpu_hp_io_base = 0;
>      pm->pcihp_io_base = 0;
>      pm->pcihp_io_len = 0;
>      if (piix) {

      reply	other threads:[~2015-07-31 12:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-07-31 10:14 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.4] acpi: avoid potential uninitialized access to cpu_hp_io_base Daniel P. Berrange
2015-07-31 12:53 ` Igor Mammedov [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20150731145303.4bf5f2b6@nial.brq.redhat.com \
    --to=imammedo@redhat.com \
    --cc=berrange@redhat.com \
    --cc=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).