From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55378) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLC7T-0001cn-I3 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:21:17 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLC7N-0005Q1-MC for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:21:11 -0400 Received: from hall.aurel32.net ([2001:bc8:30d7:100::1]:45005) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZLC7N-0005Pm-Ga for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 31 Jul 2015 11:21:05 -0400 Date: Fri, 31 Jul 2015 17:21:02 +0200 From: Aurelien Jarno Message-ID: <20150731152102.GA29132@aurel32.net> References: <1438352671-6466-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438352671-6466-1-git-send-email-rth@twiddle.net> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 0/2] Replace trunc_shr_i32 with extr[lh] List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Richard Henderson Cc: alex.bennee@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org On 2015-07-31 07:24, Richard Henderson wrote: > I'd prefer to use these two patches instead of Aurelien's > patch to rename INDEX_OP_trunc_i32. Thoughts? That sounds better to me than the current trunc_shr_i32 implementation. I'll send a new version of my patchset based on this one. Reviewed-by: Aurelien Jarno -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurelien@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net