From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34228) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMF7Y-0002ta-Qh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:45:41 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMF7U-0000Vo-5R for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:45:36 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:53920) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMF7U-0000V5-14 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 08:45:32 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 18:15:29 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20150803124529.GB28564@grmbl.mre> References: <1438098885-4339-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> <20150729175416.GN1379@perard.uk.xensource.com> <87d1z9q4zu.fsf@neno.neno> <20150803054402.GA28564@grmbl.mre> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.4 0/3] Migration regressions with Xen. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Stefano Stabellini Cc: Juan Quintela , QEMU-devel , Xen Devel , Stefano Stabellini , Anthony PERARD , "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" On (Mon) 03 Aug 2015 [10:37:26], Stefano Stabellini wrote: > On Mon, 3 Aug 2015, Amit Shah wrote: > > On (Fri) 31 Jul 2015 [10:59:47], Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > > On Thu, 30 Jul 2015, Juan Quintela wrote: > > > > > Anthony PERARD wrote: > > > > > > This is a critical issue for Xen as migration either with the same version > > > > > > of QEMU, or from a previous version of QEMU is broken. > > > > > > > > > > > > Any suggestion on how to move forward? > > > > > > > > > > Will send a pull requset tomorrow. > > > > > > > > > > Thinking about creating a single function that is called for all needed > > > > > places, just to avoid this problem in the future. > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hi Juan, > > > > > > > > thanks for looking into this! > > > > Do you have patches already we can look at and help you test to make > > > > sure they fix the issue? > > > > > > Any updates? > > > > That bigger overhaul would be 2.5 stuff now. > > That's fine, but I would appreaciate if we could get a small fix in for > the release. Of course, pull req sent. Amit