From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:59334) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMIGf-0006YB-RL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:07:19 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMIGc-0002cE-Kr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:07:13 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:32962) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZMIGc-0002c6-Fi for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2015 12:07:10 -0400 Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2015 21:37:07 +0530 From: Amit Shah Message-ID: <20150803160707.GD28564@grmbl.mre> References: <1438612161-15822-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1438612161-15822-1-git-send-email-anthony.perard@citrix.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH for-2.4 v3 0/3] Migration regressions with Xen. List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Anthony PERARD Cc: Juan Quintela , Stefano Stabellini , QEMU-devel , Xen Devel On (Mon) 03 Aug 2015 [15:29:18], Anthony PERARD wrote: > Hi, > > We've spotted several regression which prevent migration with Xen using the > same version of QEMU or from a previous version of QEMU (tryied with 2.2). > > Regression have been introduce by at least: > - df4b1024526cae3479da3492d6371fd4a7324a03 > migration: create new section to store global state > - 61964c23e5ddd5a33f15699e45ce126f879e3e33 > migration: Add configuration section > > The last patch fix migration for 'xenfv' machine and for 'pc,accel=xen' > machine. 'xenpv' machine is not affected as there is no emulated device > state to save. > > Change since in v2: > - replace memcpy() call by a strncpy(). > - Move the skip_config_section and the like from 'xenfv' machine init to > xen_init() which is called by accel_init_machine. (in 3rd patch) BTW I didn't see v2. Was the previous series marked RFC v2? The changes seem to indicate there wasn't anything else in between. Amit