From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35542)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1ZOkDR-0003ge-D6
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 06:22:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1ZOkDN-0000av-DC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 06:22:01 -0400
Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:59845)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mst@redhat.com>) id 1ZOkDN-0000aY-7V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 10 Aug 2015 06:21:57 -0400
Date: Mon, 10 Aug 2015 13:21:52 +0300
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <20150810132141-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
References: <1439113148-21937-1-git-send-email-victork@redhat.com>
	<1439113148-21937-3-git-send-email-victork@redhat.com>
	<20150809113923.GA3912@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA_JUZaW9ndA31bHemwV3=1Xf=jCJcqwLFtdRTVvVAh3+A@mail.gmail.com>
	<20150809151159-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com>
	<CAFEAcA8wz62KMtigzJsh3FS_K65V2gCEAYwxbvPD8K2nvhTsWA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8wz62KMtigzJsh3FS_K65V2gCEAYwxbvPD8K2nvhTsWA@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 2/2] make: load only required dependency
	files.
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Victor Kaplansky <victork@redhat.com>, Eduardo Habkost <ehabkost@redhat.com>, Stefan Weil <sw@weilnetz.de>, QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>, Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= <alex.bennee@linaro.org>, Richard Henderson <rth@twiddle.net>

On Mon, Aug 10, 2015 at 11:14:50AM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 9 August 2015 at 13:20, Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Still - just corious about the motivation.
> > Extra whitespace in input -> extra whitespace in output, should
> > be harmless in both cases, should it not?
> 
> Yeah, I agree that it's generally harmless. My rationale for
> preferring no-space-after-comma is that it's less misleading:
> if you're used to other languages where space-after-comma has
> no meaning at all, then it's easy to think that the two are
> identical when they're not.
> 
> End-of-line-continuations are I think slightly different
> because the fact that the space remains in the result is
> a bit more obvious (the continuation just folds things).
> 
> -- PMM

Fair enough, thanks for the clarification.