From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58086) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUSPC-0002BE-LI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:33:47 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUSP9-00072c-FD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:33:46 -0400 Received: from e23smtp06.au.ibm.com ([202.81.31.148]:55562) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUSP8-00071G-Rj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 00:33:43 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e23smtp06.au.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 26 Aug 2015 14:33:39 +1000 Date: Wed, 26 Aug 2015 10:02:40 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Message-ID: <20150826043240.GA11136@in.ibm.com> References: <1439967371-15870-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <1439967371-15870-2-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150825023035.11069.68294@loki> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150825023035.11069.68294@loki> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v0 1/3] pc-dimm: Add a field to PCDIMMDevice to mark device deletion state Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, agraf@suse.de, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, imammedo@redhat.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:30:35PM -0500, Michael Roth wrote: > Quoting Bharata B Rao (2015-08-19 01:56:09) > > Add a field to PCDIMMDevice to note that the device has been marked > > for removal. This will be used by PowerPC memory hotplug code to > > honour the LMB removal requests of only those LMBs that belong to > > PCDIMMDevice that has been marked for removal. This will be set from > > -unplug() handler. > > Why not track the delete pending state in the DRC? We have an > awaiting_release flag there for similar purpose. Ah yes, that should be possible. Will drop this patch in the next iteration. Regards, Bharata.