From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57207) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUpkO-0007A2-L4 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 01:29:13 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUpkL-0008C7-LE for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 01:29:12 -0400 Received: from e28smtp04.in.ibm.com ([122.248.162.4]:58847) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUpkL-000893-0I for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 01:29:09 -0400 Received: from /spool/local by e28smtp04.in.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:59:04 +0530 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 10:58:57 +0530 From: Bharata B Rao Message-ID: <20150827052857.GC11136@in.ibm.com> References: <1440561851-17553-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com> <20150826141709.24880.70822@loki> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20150826141709.24880.70822@loki> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [FIX PATCH] spapr_rtas: Prevent QEMU crash during hotplug without a prior device_add Reply-To: bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Michael Roth Cc: qemu-ppc@nongnu.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 09:17:09AM -0500, Michael Roth wrote: > Quoting Bharata B Rao (2015-08-25 23:04:11) > > If drmgr is used in the guest to hotplug a device before a device_add > > has been issued via the QEMU monitor, QEMU segfaults in configure_connector > > call. This occurs due to accessing of NULL FDT which otherwise would have > > been created and associated with the DRC during device_add command. > > > > Check for NULL FDT and return failure from configure_connector call. > > > > Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao > > Cc: Michael Roth > > Reviewed-by: Michael Roth > > > --- > > Not fully sure if RTAS_OUT_HW_ERROR is the right error code here. Should > > we be using RTAS_OUT_NOT_SUPPORTED instead ? Based on my reading of PAPR+ 2.7, it appears that we should return -9003 error code here. I am planning to add #define SPAPR_DR_CC_RESPONSE_NOT_CONFIGURABLE -9003 and use it when fdt is NULL in ibm,configure-connector call. Is that fine ? Regards, Bharata.