From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53559) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUwKc-0001se-Ck for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:31:06 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUwKZ-0005NS-7f for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:31:02 -0400 Received: from mx1.redhat.com ([209.132.183.28]:43434) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZUwKZ-0005Mv-2W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 Aug 2015 08:30:59 -0400 Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 15:30:55 +0300 From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" Message-ID: <20150827152902-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> References: <55DE970B.6040807@redhat.com> <20150827135126-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20150827140715-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20150827151601-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> <20150827152348-mutt-send-email-mst@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH 1/2] memory: allow zero size for adjust_endianness() List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: Paolo Bonzini , Jason Wang , QEMU Developers , Greg Kurz On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 01:27:54PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 27 August 2015 at 13:25, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 01:20:52PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > >> On 27 August 2015 at 13:17, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > >> > Basically the point is that ABI is extended to make > >> > ioeventfd with len = 0 mean "any length". > >> > 0 is thus not meaningless anymore. > >> > >> But how can you do adjustment for incorrect endianness > >> if you don't know the size of the data that you're > >> trying to work with? That's why this switch insists > >> that the size is 1, 2, 4 or 8. > > > For kvm at least, "any length" implies "any data". > > So data is eventually discarded, we don't really need > > to adjust it for endian-ness. > > I'm still confused. If you have data it needs to be > adjusted. If we're not actually doing anything with > the data why are we calling this function in the first > place? > > -- PMM I guess you could skip calls to adjust_endianness when len == 0, that should work just as well. -- MST