From: Bharata B Rao <bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com, qemu-ppc@nongnu.org,
mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com, david@gibson.dropbear.id.au
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v0] spapr: Disable memory hotplug when HTAB size is insufficient
Date: Wed, 2 Sep 2015 08:58:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20150902032854.GA31862@in.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1440387111-23689-1-git-send-email-bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Mon, Aug 24, 2015 at 09:01:51AM +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
> The hash table size allocated to guest depends on the maxmem size.
> If the host isn't able to allocate the required hash table size but
> instead allocates less than the optimal requested size, then it will
> not be possible to grow the RAM until maxmem via memory hotplug.
> Attempts to hotplug memory till maxmem could fail and this failure
> isn't being currently handled gracefully by the guest kernel thereby
> causing guest kernel oops.
>
> This should eventually get fixed when we move to completely in-kernel
> memory hotplug instead of the current method where userspace tool drmgr
> drives the hotplug. Until the in-kernel memory hotplug is available
> for PowerKVM, disable memory hotplug when requested hash table size
> isn't allocated.
David - Do you have any views on how to go about this ? Due to the way
we do hotplug currently using drmgr, it appears that it is very difficult
to have a graceful recovery within the guest kernel when memory hotplug
request can't be fulfilled due to insufficient HTAB size. (Anshuman can
elaborate on this with the exact description on why it is so hard to
recover).
Do you think disabling memory hotplug upfront is a reasonable workaround
for this problem ?
Nathan - When you enable in-kernel memory hotplug for PowerKVM, will you
be exporting something for the userspace (capability ?) to check and
determine the presense of in-kernel memory hotplug feature so that we
can depend on graceful recovery instead of upfront disablement of
memory hotplug from QEMU ?
Regards,
Bharata.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-09-02 3:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-08-24 3:31 [Qemu-devel] [RFC PATCH v0] spapr: Disable memory hotplug when HTAB size is insufficient Bharata B Rao
2015-08-24 4:34 ` Anshuman Khandual
2015-09-02 3:28 ` Bharata B Rao [this message]
2015-09-03 2:34 ` David Gibson
2015-09-03 18:50 ` Nathan Fontenot
2015-09-04 15:33 ` Michael Roth
2015-09-04 15:49 ` Nathan Fontenot
2015-09-04 16:12 ` Michael Roth
2015-09-09 9:06 ` Anshuman Khandual
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20150902032854.GA31862@in.ibm.com \
--to=bharata@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=david@gibson.dropbear.id.au \
--cc=khandual@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=mdroth@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-ppc@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).