From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33301) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQv4-0001HD-4n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:11:22 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQuz-0006Te-66 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:11:22 -0400 Received: from mail-bn1bon0053.outbound.protection.outlook.com ([157.56.111.53]:59776 helo=na01-bn1-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZaQuz-0006SM-2A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 11 Sep 2015 12:11:17 -0400 Date: Fri, 11 Sep 2015 18:11:11 +0200 From: "Edgar E. Iglesias" Message-ID: <20150911161111.GN12618@toto> References: <1441311266-8644-1-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> <1441311266-8644-5-git-send-email-edgar.iglesias@gmail.com> <20150911144027.GM12618@toto> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v1 04/10] target-arm: Add VTCR_EL2 List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Peter Maydell Cc: "Edgar E. Iglesias" , Sergey Fedorov , Alex =?iso-8859-1?Q?Benn=E9e?= , QEMU Developers , Alexander Graf On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:43:48PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote: > On 11 September 2015 at 15:40, Edgar E. Iglesias > wrote: > > In the interest avoiding duplication, do you think the following makes > > sense for regs with the el3_aa32ns_aa64any access checks? > > > > 1. Use STATE_BOTH for "low-activity" registers (e.g the EL3 view when EL2 does not exist). > > 2. Use STATE_BOTH for regs that anyway have a read/write function > > 3. Split AA64 and AA32 reg entries for regs without read/write helper call for spead (e.g VTCR_EL2). > > Sounds plausible. > OK, thanks!