* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix host_to_target_cmsg in case of multiple headers
@ 2015-08-27 14:50 Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-08-27 18:06 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-08-27 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Riku Voipio
In the current implementation, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer
derived from target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh
(through subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code
under x86_64, because pointers in the host address space and pointers in
the guest address space were not the same. This patch adds a g2h()
address translation around the msg_control value.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
---
linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
index edd5f3c..1eaaf2a 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
+++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ __target_cmsg_nxthdr (struct target_msghdr *__mhdr, struct target_cmsghdr *__cms
__ptr = (struct target_cmsghdr *)((unsigned char *) __cmsg
+ TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (tswapal(__cmsg->cmsg_len)));
- if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)(size_t)tswapal(__mhdr->msg_control))
+ if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)g2h(tswapal(__mhdr->msg_control)))
> tswapal(__mhdr->msg_controllen))
/* No more entries. */
return (struct target_cmsghdr *)0;
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix host_to_target_cmsg in case of multiple headers
2015-08-27 14:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix host_to_target_cmsg in case of multiple headers Jonathan Neuschäfer
@ 2015-08-27 18:06 ` Peter Maydell
2015-08-29 16:04 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-08-27 18:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer; +Cc: Riku Voipio, QEMU Developers
On 27 August 2015 at 15:50, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> In the current implementation, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer
> derived from target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh
> (through subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code
> under x86_64, because pointers in the host address space and pointers in
> the guest address space were not the same. This patch adds a g2h()
> address translation around the msg_control value.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> ---
> linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 2 +-
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> index edd5f3c..1eaaf2a 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ __target_cmsg_nxthdr (struct target_msghdr *__mhdr, struct target_cmsghdr *__cms
>
> __ptr = (struct target_cmsghdr *)((unsigned char *) __cmsg
> + TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (tswapal(__cmsg->cmsg_len)));
> - if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)(size_t)tswapal(__mhdr->msg_control))
> + if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)g2h(tswapal(__mhdr->msg_control)))
> > tswapal(__mhdr->msg_controllen))
> /* No more entries. */
> return (struct target_cmsghdr *)0;
This definitely looks like a bug, but I don't think this is
a sufficient fix, because if DEBUG_REMAP is defined then the
locked-memory which the target_cmsghdr* is in is not a
simple g2h() away from the host pointer.
What you need to do is change target_to_host_cmsg and
host_to_target_cmsg so that when at the top of the function
we do:
target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 1);
we save that target_cmsg into some variable (eg target_msg_control),
and pass it into the TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR macro. That host pointer
is the one we need to use on the right side of the subtraction.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix host_to_target_cmsg in case of multiple headers
2015-08-27 18:06 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2015-08-29 16:04 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-08-29 16:35 ` Peter Maydell
2015-08-31 19:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion " Jonathan Neuschäfer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-08-29 16:04 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: Riku Voipio, Jonathan Neuschäfer, QEMU Developers
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:06:24PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> This definitely looks like a bug, but I don't think this is
> a sufficient fix, because if DEBUG_REMAP is defined then the
> locked-memory which the target_cmsghdr* is in is not a
> simple g2h() away from the host pointer.
>
> What you need to do is change target_to_host_cmsg and
> host_to_target_cmsg so that when at the top of the function
> we do:
> target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
> target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 1);
After following your advice, I found two more bugs in related code,
which I had to fix. I probably missed something, but my test case
(wine), which receives two headers via a single recvmsg call, is now
working properly. Perhaps an isolated test case would be nice.
I'll send my new patch soon.
Regards,
Jonathan Neuschäfer
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix host_to_target_cmsg in case of multiple headers
2015-08-29 16:04 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
@ 2015-08-29 16:35 ` Peter Maydell
2015-08-31 19:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion " Jonathan Neuschäfer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-08-29 16:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer; +Cc: Riku Voipio, QEMU Developers
On 29 August 2015 at 17:04, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 07:06:24PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> This definitely looks like a bug, but I don't think this is
>> a sufficient fix, because if DEBUG_REMAP is defined then the
>> locked-memory which the target_cmsghdr* is in is not a
>> simple g2h() away from the host pointer.
>>
>> What you need to do is change target_to_host_cmsg and
>> host_to_target_cmsg so that when at the top of the function
>> we do:
>> target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
>> target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 1);
>
> After following your advice, I found two more bugs in related code,
> which I had to fix. I probably missed something, but my test case
> (wine), which receives two headers via a single recvmsg call, is now
> working properly. Perhaps an isolated test case would be nice.
I generally test linux-user with the LTP tests:
http://wiki.qemu.org/Testing/LTP
though they're not always as good at flushing out QEMU
bugs as you might hope. Still, LTP is probably the best
home for syscall tests.
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-08-29 16:04 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-08-29 16:35 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2015-08-31 19:27 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-01 15:45 ` Peter Maydell
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-08-31 19:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: QEMU Developers; +Cc: Peter Maydell, Riku Voipio, Jonathan Neuschäfer
Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
I found and fixed two more related bugs:
- __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
old one.
- tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
--
Changes since v1:
- Follow Peter Maydell's advice on how to fix the first bug
- The "two more related bugs"
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 14 +++++++++-----
linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 9 +++++----
2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index f62c698..12a6cd2 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(msgh);
abi_long msg_controllen;
abi_ulong target_cmsg_addr;
- struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg;
+ struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg, *target_cmsg_start;
socklen_t space = 0;
msg_controllen = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_controllen);
@@ -1189,6 +1189,7 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
goto the_end;
target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 1);
+ target_cmsg_start = target_cmsg;
if (!target_cmsg)
return -TARGET_EFAULT;
@@ -1247,7 +1248,8 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
}
cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(msgh, cmsg);
- target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg);
+ target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg,
+ target_cmsg_start);
}
unlock_user(target_cmsg, target_cmsg_addr, 0);
the_end:
@@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(msgh);
abi_long msg_controllen;
abi_ulong target_cmsg_addr;
- struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg;
+ struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg, *target_cmsg_start;
socklen_t space = 0;
msg_controllen = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_controllen);
@@ -1269,6 +1271,7 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
goto the_end;
target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 0);
+ target_cmsg_start = target_cmsg;
if (!target_cmsg)
return -TARGET_EFAULT;
@@ -1382,14 +1385,15 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
}
target_cmsg->cmsg_len = tswapal(tgt_len);
- tgt_space = TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(tgt_len);
+ tgt_space = TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(len);
if (msg_controllen < tgt_space) {
tgt_space = msg_controllen;
}
msg_controllen -= tgt_space;
space += tgt_space;
cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(msgh, cmsg);
- target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg);
+ target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg,
+ target_cmsg_start);
}
unlock_user(target_cmsg, target_cmsg_addr, space);
the_end:
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
index edd5f3c..8b0e354 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
+++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
@@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ struct target_cmsghdr {
};
#define TARGET_CMSG_DATA(cmsg) ((unsigned char *) ((struct target_cmsghdr *) (cmsg) + 1))
-#define TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(mhdr, cmsg) __target_cmsg_nxthdr (mhdr, cmsg)
+#define TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(mhdr, cmsg, cmsg_start) \
+ __target_cmsg_nxthdr (mhdr, cmsg, cmsg_start)
#define TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN(len) (((len) + sizeof (abi_long) - 1) \
& (size_t) ~(sizeof (abi_long) - 1))
#define TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(len) (TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (len) \
@@ -242,17 +243,17 @@ struct target_cmsghdr {
#define TARGET_CMSG_LEN(len) (TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (sizeof (struct target_cmsghdr)) + (len))
static __inline__ struct target_cmsghdr *
-__target_cmsg_nxthdr (struct target_msghdr *__mhdr, struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg)
+__target_cmsg_nxthdr (struct target_msghdr *__mhdr, struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg, struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg_start)
{
struct target_cmsghdr *__ptr;
__ptr = (struct target_cmsghdr *)((unsigned char *) __cmsg
+ TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (tswapal(__cmsg->cmsg_len)));
- if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)(size_t)tswapal(__mhdr->msg_control))
+ if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)__cmsg_start)
> tswapal(__mhdr->msg_controllen))
/* No more entries. */
return (struct target_cmsghdr *)0;
- return __cmsg;
+ return __ptr;
}
struct target_mmsghdr {
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-08-31 19:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion " Jonathan Neuschäfer
@ 2015-09-01 15:45 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-02 3:12 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-03 5:27 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-01 15:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer; +Cc: Riku Voipio, QEMU Developers
On 31 August 2015 at 20:27, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
> target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
> subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
> because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
> address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
> target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
>
> I found and fixed two more related bugs:
> - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
> old one.
> - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
> target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Code-wise this looks good; thanks. There are a few minor style
nits caught by scripts/checkpatch.pl, which it would be nice if
you can fix. (They're mostly things that were present in the code
already, but we like to fix the style issues when a patch has
to touch a line of code anyway.)
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-01 15:45 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2015-09-02 3:12 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-03 5:27 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-09-02 3:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: Riku Voipio, Jonathan Neuschäfer, QEMU Developers
On Tue, Sep 01, 2015 at 04:45:12PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> Code-wise this looks good; thanks. There are a few minor style
> nits caught by scripts/checkpatch.pl, which it would be nice if
> you can fix. (They're mostly things that were present in the code
> already, but we like to fix the style issues when a patch has
> to touch a line of code anyway.)
Okay, I'll fix the style issues.
--
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-01 15:45 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-02 3:12 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
@ 2015-09-03 5:27 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-04 12:48 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-28 13:38 ` Riku Voipio
1 sibling, 2 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-09-03 5:27 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: QEMU Developers; +Cc: Peter Maydell, Riku Voipio, Jonathan Neuschäfer
Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
I found and fixed two more related bugs:
- __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
old one.
- tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
--
Changes since v2:
- The patch is now clean WRT checkpatch.pl
Changes since v1:
- Follow Peter Maydell's advice on how to fix the first bug
- The "two more related bugs"
---
linux-user/syscall.c | 14 +++++++++-----
linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 14 +++++++++-----
2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
index f62c698..12a6cd2 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall.c
+++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
@@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(msgh);
abi_long msg_controllen;
abi_ulong target_cmsg_addr;
- struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg;
+ struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg, *target_cmsg_start;
socklen_t space = 0;
msg_controllen = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_controllen);
@@ -1189,6 +1189,7 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
goto the_end;
target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 1);
+ target_cmsg_start = target_cmsg;
if (!target_cmsg)
return -TARGET_EFAULT;
@@ -1247,7 +1248,8 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
}
cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(msgh, cmsg);
- target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg);
+ target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg,
+ target_cmsg_start);
}
unlock_user(target_cmsg, target_cmsg_addr, 0);
the_end:
@@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(msgh);
abi_long msg_controllen;
abi_ulong target_cmsg_addr;
- struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg;
+ struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg, *target_cmsg_start;
socklen_t space = 0;
msg_controllen = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_controllen);
@@ -1269,6 +1271,7 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
goto the_end;
target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 0);
+ target_cmsg_start = target_cmsg;
if (!target_cmsg)
return -TARGET_EFAULT;
@@ -1382,14 +1385,15 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
}
target_cmsg->cmsg_len = tswapal(tgt_len);
- tgt_space = TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(tgt_len);
+ tgt_space = TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(len);
if (msg_controllen < tgt_space) {
tgt_space = msg_controllen;
}
msg_controllen -= tgt_space;
space += tgt_space;
cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(msgh, cmsg);
- target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg);
+ target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg,
+ target_cmsg_start);
}
unlock_user(target_cmsg, target_cmsg_addr, space);
the_end:
diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
index edd5f3c..9d3c537 100644
--- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
+++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
@@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ struct target_cmsghdr {
};
#define TARGET_CMSG_DATA(cmsg) ((unsigned char *) ((struct target_cmsghdr *) (cmsg) + 1))
-#define TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(mhdr, cmsg) __target_cmsg_nxthdr (mhdr, cmsg)
+#define TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(mhdr, cmsg, cmsg_start) \
+ __target_cmsg_nxthdr(mhdr, cmsg, cmsg_start)
#define TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN(len) (((len) + sizeof (abi_long) - 1) \
& (size_t) ~(sizeof (abi_long) - 1))
#define TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(len) (TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (len) \
@@ -242,17 +243,20 @@ struct target_cmsghdr {
#define TARGET_CMSG_LEN(len) (TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (sizeof (struct target_cmsghdr)) + (len))
static __inline__ struct target_cmsghdr *
-__target_cmsg_nxthdr (struct target_msghdr *__mhdr, struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg)
+__target_cmsg_nxthdr(struct target_msghdr *__mhdr,
+ struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg,
+ struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg_start)
{
struct target_cmsghdr *__ptr;
__ptr = (struct target_cmsghdr *)((unsigned char *) __cmsg
+ TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (tswapal(__cmsg->cmsg_len)));
- if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)(size_t)tswapal(__mhdr->msg_control))
- > tswapal(__mhdr->msg_controllen))
+ if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)__cmsg_start)
+ > tswapal(__mhdr->msg_controllen)) {
/* No more entries. */
return (struct target_cmsghdr *)0;
- return __cmsg;
+ }
+ return __ptr;
}
struct target_mmsghdr {
--
2.5.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-03 5:27 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
@ 2015-09-04 12:48 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-21 5:34 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-28 13:38 ` Riku Voipio
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-04 12:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer; +Cc: Riku Voipio, QEMU Developers
On 3 September 2015 at 06:27, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
> target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
> subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
> because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
> address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
> target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
>
> I found and fixed two more related bugs:
> - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
> old one.
> - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
> target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
thanks
-- PMM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-04 12:48 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2015-09-21 5:34 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-21 13:13 ` Peter Maydell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-09-21 5:34 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: Riku Voipio, Jonathan Neuschäfer, QEMU Developers
On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 3 September 2015 at 06:27, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> > Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
> > target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
> > subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
> > because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
> > address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
> > target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
> >
> > I found and fixed two more related bugs:
> > - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
> > old one.
> > - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
> > target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
>
> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Ping.
What's the status of this patch?
Regards,
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-21 5:34 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
@ 2015-09-21 13:13 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-21 19:45 ` Riku Voipio
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Peter Maydell @ 2015-09-21 13:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer; +Cc: Riku Voipio, QEMU Developers
On 20 September 2015 at 22:34, Jonathan Neuschäfer
<j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
>> On 3 September 2015 at 06:27, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
>> > Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
>> > target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
>> > subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
>> > because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
>> > address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
>> > target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
>> >
>> > I found and fixed two more related bugs:
>> > - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
>> > old one.
>> > - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
>> > target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
>>
>> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
>
> Ping.
>
> What's the status of this patch?
It's waiting for Riku to wake up and put it into a linux-user
pull request.
thanks
-- MPM
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-21 13:13 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2015-09-21 19:45 ` Riku Voipio
2015-09-21 19:50 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Riku Voipio @ 2015-09-21 19:45 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Peter Maydell; +Cc: Jonathan Neuschäfer, QEMU Developers
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:13:57AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote:
> On 20 September 2015 at 22:34, Jonathan Neuschäfer
> <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 04, 2015 at 01:48:39PM +0100, Peter Maydell wrote:
> >> On 3 September 2015 at 06:27, Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net> wrote:
> >> > Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
> >> > target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
> >> > subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
> >> > because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
> >> > address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
> >> > target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
> >> >
> >> > I found and fixed two more related bugs:
> >> > - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
> >> > old one.
> >> > - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
> >> > target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
> >> >
> >> > Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
> >
> > Ping.
> >
> > What's the status of this patch?
> It's waiting for Riku to wake up and put it into a linux-user
> pull request.
My intention was to gather a pull request before this travel, but
alas I was stuck with other stuff. I'll get it done next week latest.
Riku
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-21 19:45 ` Riku Voipio
@ 2015-09-21 19:50 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-09-21 19:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Riku Voipio; +Cc: Peter Maydell, Jonathan Neuschäfer, QEMU Developers
On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 12:45:21PM -0700, Riku Voipio wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 06:13:57AM -0700, Peter Maydell wrote:
> > On 20 September 2015 at 22:34, Jonathan Neuschäfer
[...]
> > > What's the status of this patch?
>
> > It's waiting for Riku to wake up and put it into a linux-user
> > pull request.
>
> My intention was to gather a pull request before this travel, but
> alas I was stuck with other stuff. I'll get it done next week latest.
No problem, take your time. I was just worried that it might get lost.
--
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-03 5:27 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-04 12:48 ` Peter Maydell
@ 2015-09-28 13:38 ` Riku Voipio
2015-09-28 22:07 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
1 sibling, 1 reply; 15+ messages in thread
From: Riku Voipio @ 2015-09-28 13:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Neuschäfer; +Cc: Peter Maydell, QEMU Developers
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 07:27:26AM +0200, Jonathan Neuschäfer wrote:
> Currently, __target_cmsg_nxthdr compares a pointer derived from
> target_cmsg against the msg_control field of target_msgh (through
> subtraction). This failed for me when emulating i386 code under x86_64,
> because pointers in the host address space and pointers in the guest
> address space were not the same. This patch passes the initial value of
> target_cmsg into __target_cmsg_nxthdr.
>
> I found and fixed two more related bugs:
> - __target_cmsg_nxthdr now returns the new cmsg pointer instead of the
> old one.
> - tgt_space (in host_to_target_cmsg) doesn't count "sizeof (struct
> target_cmsghdr)" twice anymore.
Applied to linux-user tree, thanks.
> Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
> --
For next time, use three dashes "---" to separate version-to-version
change descriptions from commit messages. This way git will
automatically leave them out when doing git am.
> Changes since v2:
> - The patch is now clean WRT checkpatch.pl
> Changes since v1:
> - Follow Peter Maydell's advice on how to fix the first bug
> - The "two more related bugs"
> ---
> linux-user/syscall.c | 14 +++++++++-----
> linux-user/syscall_defs.h | 14 +++++++++-----
> 2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall.c b/linux-user/syscall.c
> index f62c698..12a6cd2 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall.c
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall.c
> @@ -1181,7 +1181,7 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
> struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(msgh);
> abi_long msg_controllen;
> abi_ulong target_cmsg_addr;
> - struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg;
> + struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg, *target_cmsg_start;
> socklen_t space = 0;
>
> msg_controllen = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_controllen);
> @@ -1189,6 +1189,7 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
> goto the_end;
> target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
> target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_READ, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 1);
> + target_cmsg_start = target_cmsg;
> if (!target_cmsg)
> return -TARGET_EFAULT;
>
> @@ -1247,7 +1248,8 @@ static inline abi_long target_to_host_cmsg(struct msghdr *msgh,
> }
>
> cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(msgh, cmsg);
> - target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg);
> + target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg,
> + target_cmsg_start);
> }
> unlock_user(target_cmsg, target_cmsg_addr, 0);
> the_end:
> @@ -1261,7 +1263,7 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
> struct cmsghdr *cmsg = CMSG_FIRSTHDR(msgh);
> abi_long msg_controllen;
> abi_ulong target_cmsg_addr;
> - struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg;
> + struct target_cmsghdr *target_cmsg, *target_cmsg_start;
> socklen_t space = 0;
>
> msg_controllen = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_controllen);
> @@ -1269,6 +1271,7 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
> goto the_end;
> target_cmsg_addr = tswapal(target_msgh->msg_control);
> target_cmsg = lock_user(VERIFY_WRITE, target_cmsg_addr, msg_controllen, 0);
> + target_cmsg_start = target_cmsg;
> if (!target_cmsg)
> return -TARGET_EFAULT;
>
> @@ -1382,14 +1385,15 @@ static inline abi_long host_to_target_cmsg(struct target_msghdr *target_msgh,
> }
>
> target_cmsg->cmsg_len = tswapal(tgt_len);
> - tgt_space = TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(tgt_len);
> + tgt_space = TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(len);
> if (msg_controllen < tgt_space) {
> tgt_space = msg_controllen;
> }
> msg_controllen -= tgt_space;
> space += tgt_space;
> cmsg = CMSG_NXTHDR(msgh, cmsg);
> - target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg);
> + target_cmsg = TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(target_msgh, target_cmsg,
> + target_cmsg_start);
> }
> unlock_user(target_cmsg, target_cmsg_addr, space);
> the_end:
> diff --git a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> index edd5f3c..9d3c537 100644
> --- a/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> +++ b/linux-user/syscall_defs.h
> @@ -234,7 +234,8 @@ struct target_cmsghdr {
> };
>
> #define TARGET_CMSG_DATA(cmsg) ((unsigned char *) ((struct target_cmsghdr *) (cmsg) + 1))
> -#define TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(mhdr, cmsg) __target_cmsg_nxthdr (mhdr, cmsg)
> +#define TARGET_CMSG_NXTHDR(mhdr, cmsg, cmsg_start) \
> + __target_cmsg_nxthdr(mhdr, cmsg, cmsg_start)
> #define TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN(len) (((len) + sizeof (abi_long) - 1) \
> & (size_t) ~(sizeof (abi_long) - 1))
> #define TARGET_CMSG_SPACE(len) (TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (len) \
> @@ -242,17 +243,20 @@ struct target_cmsghdr {
> #define TARGET_CMSG_LEN(len) (TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (sizeof (struct target_cmsghdr)) + (len))
>
> static __inline__ struct target_cmsghdr *
> -__target_cmsg_nxthdr (struct target_msghdr *__mhdr, struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg)
> +__target_cmsg_nxthdr(struct target_msghdr *__mhdr,
> + struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg,
> + struct target_cmsghdr *__cmsg_start)
> {
> struct target_cmsghdr *__ptr;
>
> __ptr = (struct target_cmsghdr *)((unsigned char *) __cmsg
> + TARGET_CMSG_ALIGN (tswapal(__cmsg->cmsg_len)));
> - if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)(size_t)tswapal(__mhdr->msg_control))
> - > tswapal(__mhdr->msg_controllen))
> + if ((unsigned long)((char *)(__ptr+1) - (char *)__cmsg_start)
> + > tswapal(__mhdr->msg_controllen)) {
> /* No more entries. */
> return (struct target_cmsghdr *)0;
> - return __cmsg;
> + }
> + return __ptr;
> }
>
> struct target_mmsghdr {
> --
> 2.5.0
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion in case of multiple headers
2015-09-28 13:38 ` Riku Voipio
@ 2015-09-28 22:07 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 15+ messages in thread
From: Jonathan Neuschäfer @ 2015-09-28 22:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Riku Voipio; +Cc: Peter Maydell, Jonathan Neuschäfer, QEMU Developers
On Mon, Sep 28, 2015 at 04:38:03PM +0300, Riku Voipio wrote:
> Applied to linux-user tree, thanks.
Thanks.
> For next time, use three dashes "---" to separate version-to-version
> change descriptions from commit messages. This way git will
> automatically leave them out when doing git am.
Ok, I'll do that.
Jonathan
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 15+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2015-09-28 22:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2015-08-27 14:50 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix host_to_target_cmsg in case of multiple headers Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-08-27 18:06 ` Peter Maydell
2015-08-29 16:04 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-08-29 16:35 ` Peter Maydell
2015-08-31 19:27 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] linux-user: fix cmsg conversion " Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-01 15:45 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-02 3:12 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-03 5:27 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-04 12:48 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-21 5:34 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-21 13:13 ` Peter Maydell
2015-09-21 19:45 ` Riku Voipio
2015-09-21 19:50 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
2015-09-28 13:38 ` Riku Voipio
2015-09-28 22:07 ` Jonathan Neuschäfer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).